The more popular one with the most votes.
Basically because in the modern world the candidate with the most funding is likely to win.
It is difficult to predict the outcome of an election with certainty. The candidate who receives the most votes from the electorate is most likely to win.
It is difficult to predict with certainty who will win the upcoming election as it depends on various factors such as voter turnout, campaign strategies, and current events. It is important to stay informed and consider multiple sources of information before forming an opinion on the likely candidate to win.
Politically, a safe seat is one where the incumbent candidate is sure that he or she will win again. A city like San Francisco is very liberal, so whoever is running as the democratic candidate is likely to win. A community like Salt Lake City Utah is overwhelmingly conservative, so the republican candidate will always win.
to win and gain more support and donations to the campaign, so that he/she can ultimately win the party's nomination.
In a poker game, a straight is more likely to win than a pair.
People vote for a candidate. Each state has a given number of electoral votes. Win the state, get the votes from that state. Get more votes than your opponent, and you have been elected.
Most likely, the Lakers will win. That's my opinion. :b
It is more likely that Argentina will win, but there is all to play for.
Attract more voters for the presidential candidate
No, a candidate cannot win after conceding. Conceding is a formal acknowledgment of defeat in an election. Once a candidate concedes, they are essentially admitting that they have lost and are no longer actively seeking to win.
In a single-member district plurality voting system, a candidate needs to receive more votes than any other candidate to win, but not necessarily a majority of the votes (over 50%). This means that a candidate can win with just the highest number of votes, even if that number is less than half of the total votes cast. This system often leads to situations where a candidate can win despite having less overall support than multiple opponents.