supreme court
supreme court
Yes, the courts interpret the Constitution. The Supreme Court of the United States, specifically, makes the final determination about how the Constitution should be interpreted.
Yes, the US Supreme Court should be the final arbiter of the meaning of the Constitution. As the highest court in the land, it is responsible for interpreting and applying the Constitution to legal disputes. Its role as the final authority ensures consistency in constitutional interpretation across the country and helps maintain the balance of power among the three branches of government.
According to the US Constitution itself, the United States Supreme Court is the final interpreter of the Constitution. The Court's decisions are final and are seldom changed.
pretty sure it is, its a part of the judicial branch The Supreme Court is not the highest law in the land; the Constitution is. The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. The Supreme Court is the final appeals court; decisions made by it are final. But these decisions still represent the interpretation of the court, and such decisions can theoretically be overturned by the same or future courts.
The Supreme Court settles questions about interpretation of the US Constitution.
narrow interpretation is the in between interpretation of the judges of the supreme court. In a narrow interpretation the judges fallow what is on the constitution but also their ideas.
Any court can interpret the constitution, but the US Supreme Court is the final arbiter on constitutionality.
The supreme court
The [State] Supreme Court (or its equivalent) has final authority unless the question being addressed in the state constitution conflicts with the US Constitution, in which case the US Supreme Court has final authority.
The Supreme Court.
Supreme Court