There is a curious passage in John 21:22-23, where Jesus says to Peter thatif he wills thatthe 'disciple whom Jesus loved' (commonly assumed to be John)tarry until Jesus comes, what is that to Peter?This was a rebuke to Peter, not a command to the beloved disciple, nor
a prophecy that the beloved disciple would never die or be spared a martyr's death.
The next verse says
that
this saying went abroad, misinterpreted that the disciple should not die, yet
Jesus said not this, but "If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?
"
So, the statement was made to Peter and was about the "Disciple whom Jesus loved," commonly supposed to be the apostle John.
me
You've got a few details mixed up. He never KICKED Jesus. Jesus said to Peter, speaking about John, "...If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me." He didn't say John WOULD live till Jesus comes, He only asked what business it was of Peter's IF Jesus decided that. The verse is John 21:22.
Thomas initially could not believe Jesus was present with them after crucifixion. His doubts quickly disappeared when Jesus spoke to him and invited Thomas to touch His wounds.
In the fourth gospel, this was the "disciple whom Jesus loved". We do not know who the "disciple whom Jesus loved" was meant to be. Irenaeus identified him as being John, a view that is still held by conservative Christians today, and drew the conclusion that John was the author of this gospel, which had previously been anonymous. This was speculation and, today, most scholars doubt that the author really was John.A consistent theme of John's Gospel is that Peter was always compared unfavourably with the "disciple whom Jesus loved". It seems likely that the real author of John was troubled by the reverence given to Peter, and wanted to portray him as no more than a disciple, so as to get the focus back on Jesus. He did not want to create another personality cult in place of that of Peter. By choosing an anonymous disciple, he ensured that this disciple coud not be worshipped. By calling him the "disciple whom Jesus loved" he made it clear that there was a disciple much greater than Peter, without appearing to disparage Peter. The scene in John 13:23 serves to emphasise the affection that Jesus felt for this disciple. So, the "disciple whom Jesus loved" is likely to have been no more than a literary invention.
When Jesus comes back, that is where he is coming back.
We have Easter because that is the day that Jesus comes back to life.
2012 or when jesus comes back are 2 theorys
Nicodemus came at night to ask Jesus questions and changed his heart andthen decided as he WA a wealthy man wrongly taken . He said he would return it back to the people.
Mary MagdaleneAnother answer:John 21:20, 21 - Then Peter, turning around, saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following, who also had leaned on His breast at the supper, and said, "Lord, who is the one who betrays You?" Peter, seeing him, said to Jesus, "But Lord, what about this man?"The disciple Peter asked about had "leaned on Jesus' breast at the supper" and asked who would betray Him.John 13:23, 24 - Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of His disciples, whom Jesus loved. Simon Peter therefore motioned to him to ask who it was of whom He spoke. Then, leaning back on Jesus' breast, he said to Him, "Lord, who is it?""The disciple whom Jesus loved" was John's way of referring to himself in his gospel. Simon Peter was inquiring about John.[Quotes from NKJV]
Jesus will come a second time only after the antichrist kills people.
When Jesus comes back He will make a new heaven and new earth.
no because jesus is lord and until he comes back we will never know cause we dont know when jesus is coming back