none the were both born in England
He controlled New Amsterdam which became New York. The Duke was the kings brother so was given New York.
Two. New York and New Amsterdam. It was new Amsterdam From 1625-1674. After that it was called New York. (named after the Duke of York)
New Amsterdam and the duke of york is why they named new york new york
He was all like can i be control of new Amsterdam and they said shore y not
New York was named after the Duke of York in Britain after the British took New Amsterdam (later named New York) from the dutch.
He didn't discover anything. He took New Amsterdam from the Dutch and named it New York.
New York was originally called "New Amsterdam". Because of the Duke of York it was given a new name. He gained control of New Amsterdam in the 17th century and changed the name.
New Amsterdam. They were Dutch until the Duke of York took it away from them to create New York.
new york was originally a dutch colony called new amsterdam, then the land was sold the english, who renamed it after york city in northern england, not the duke of york.
the grant to new york (or back then new amsterdam) to The Duke of York
Where NY is did belong to the Dutch back in the 1600's and as time went along England took it order and that area was given to the Duke of York where the name was Change from New Amsterdam to New York. I believe in the early 1700's.
New York got its name from the Duke of York, who gained control of the land in the 17th century. Originally it was called "New Amsterdam" by the Dutch settlers but when control of this area was taken over by English, its name was also changed to "New York," to honor the Duke of York. There is an "Old York" (or just York) back in England.New York was named for the Duke of York, later King James II of England. It had originally been called New Amsterdam by the Dutch, who founded the city.The duke of york named the country after himself just so he could own New York for good