Planned economic systems would have the least private ownership.
Under communism, you would find the least private ownership.
1. Ownership of private property/ 2.Perfect competition . 3. Profit motive. 4.Consumers' soveriegnty. 5. Freedom of occupational choice. 6. Least government interference.
1. Ownership of private property/ 2.Perfect competition . 3. Profit motive. 4.Consumers' soveriegnty. 5. Freedom of occupational choice. 6. Least government interference.
capitalism
direct democracy
I think it's the command economy.
To purchase, you must possess or manage at least $50 million USD. That is the basic minimum for membership in the club. Some of the most expensive private planes cost much more, but fractional ownership is available for lesser ones. Try and go to this website jetshare.io if you want to invest in this kind of ownership.
Your question asks for an opinion. My opinion is no, it would not be. Places that have outlawed private ownership of firearms have had INCREASES in violent crime. This is due, at least in part, in the loss of the ability of law abiding people to defend themselves. This would be similar to dealing with drunk driving by outlawing the ownership of cars.
no, paperwork is needed to transfer title of ownership to you as the new legal owner, perhaps you culd try a private sale but in order to register it you would need paperwork, at least a bill of sale.
Command. The government tells you what to do and you have to follow.
Yes, at least basic honesty. Profiting by deciet and misreprpresentation is wrong.
The patroon system of land ownership system was created by the Dutch, and resembled feudal land ownership. The patroon was provided a land grant by the government, after he has agreed to get at least 50 families to settle there within four years, and farm his land. In exchange for the land, the settlers pay the patroon a fee. Patroons had self-contained villages with their own church and village.