0
The gold foil experiment, because it proved that there were nuclei in the atoms
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was Thomson's model atom called?
The name was plum pudding.
What was Thompson's model of the atom called?
its called the plum pudding model
What was Thomson's model of the atomic atom?
according to jj thomsons model of an atom,an atom consists of a positively charged sphere with electrons in it.however,it was later found that positively charged particles reside at the center of the atom called nucleus,and the electrons revolve around the nucleus.
How did Thomson's' experiment change Dalton's atomic model?
An atomic model of Dalton doesn't exist; the model of Thomson was called plum pudding model.
What did the pudding represent in the plum pudding model?
Thomson's plum pudding model is the model of an atom in which an atom is regarded as a sphere of size 10^(-10)m radius and positively charged matter in which electrons were embedded. Thomson used the pudding as the positive charge and the plums as the negative charge. The plums are stuck in the pudding just as electrons are randomly found in an atom.
What was Thomson's model atom called?
The name was plum pudding.
What was Thompson's model of the atom called?
its called the plum pudding model
What was JJ Thomsons 1904 model called?
The model was called the: The Plum Pudding Model
What was Thomson's model of the atomic atom?
according to jj thomsons model of an atom,an atom consists of a positively charged sphere with electrons in it.however,it was later found that positively charged particles reside at the center of the atom called nucleus,and the electrons revolve around the nucleus.
What was Thomson's model of atom called?
The name was plum pudding.
How did Thomson's' experiment change Dalton's atomic model?
An atomic model of Dalton doesn't exist; the model of Thomson was called plum pudding model.
What is Thompson Model?
plum pudding
Which scientist developed plum pudding model?
The plum pudding model of the atom was put forward by J.J. Thomson.
When did Ernest Rutherford propose the plum pudding model of the atom?
The ''plum pudding atomic model" is from J. J. Thomson, year 1904.
What is JJ Thompsons model?
plum pudding
How do the plum pudding model and Rutherfords model of an atom differ?
The plum pudding model displays the atom as negatively charged electron embedded in a fluid of positive charge, thus the name plum for the electron and the pudding for the positive fluid thought to balance the negative charges. The Rutherford model is based on the gold foil experiment and it has a nucleus in which is extremely small, positively charged and dense. The model has lots of empty space around the nucleus which was where the electrons were placed.
What caused a Rutherford to propose a revised model of atom?
he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it.
