Want this question answered?
The rabbits in South America were different from the rabbits in Europe.
rgterter
Rephrase the question?
That depends on how old the money is. Different countries have different regulations regarding this. There will also need to be an explanation as to where the old money has come from.
Non-participatory observations are 1) non-transparent to whomever is being "observed", 2) inequitable regarding the presence of the observed in the observation act 3) exclusive, regarding direct participation in all aspects of observation including the outcomes of observation.
Darwin's observations regarding ostriches led him to the theory of Evolution. For example, when he visited one part of Argentina, he noticed that the ostriches were similar, not the same, to ostriches from another region of Argentina. The fossil record also mimicked this loosely. Thus, Darwin began to look for a viable theory that could answer this. Hence, the theory of Evolution was born, which made the scientific explanation for life as we know it today. I hope this answers your question.
Ptolemy had no way to detect or measure the parallax of stars, and was completely unaware of it. So the lack of any explanation was no problem.
Yes they do sharks eat anything smaller than them
The earth is an oblate spheroid. There are no different theories regarding this. There are some misguided or ignorant people that do not believe this.
USA
A conclusion is a final statement or decision, while an observation is finding information by using any of the five senses (sight, sound, feel, smell, and taste).An observation is what you notice is happeningA conclusion is what you decide after the experiment, and whether it relates to your hypothesis.
We are very different..