Technically, as long as both are 'accurate,' both are acceptable.
However, we don't live in an ideal world. In a 10mL graduated cylinder, the height difference between 1mL is visible, where in a 1L (1000mL) graduated cylinder, 1mL of difference isn't quite visible.
a graduated cylinder. If you can find one that measures 100 mL, then this will be most accurate. If you find one that measures 1000 mL, this will be less accurate.
50 ml is 50/1000 of a litre. Whether of not you use a graduated cylinder (however you choose to spell the word) is irrelevant.
This would be called a graduated cillender. But the ccs vary in this tool...from 100 to 1000 * * * * * A graduated CYLINDER might be a better choice!
No, a beaker is a poor choice of instrument to measure volume. Instead try a graduated cylinder. Generally, the smaller the diameter of graduated cylinder, the more accurate it will be. A grad cylinder will have the increments written up along the side with carefully placed "hash marks" indicating the volume of substance/solution in the cylinder. A breaker may have a few markings indicating the volume of the contents up the side, but not enough make it an accurate measuring device for varying volumes of liquid.
1000
It depends by what you mean by large. Large in a science laboratory could be 1 liter, but in an industrial factory it could mean 1000 liters!Typically, to measure volume of liquids from 100 mL to 5 liters either a graduated cylinder or a volumetric flask is used, both of which are available is numerous different sizes in that range.See the Related Questions to the left for more information about graduated cylinders and volumetric flasks.
Four cylinder is 1000 lbs six cylinder is 2000 lbs
Height = 1000/(pi*42) = 19.89436769 mm
1000 pounds
It is accurate to 1/2 second per lunar month (about 1 and 1/2 hours per 1000 years).
Yes, It is a more accurate version of the M14. Its range is about 1000 meters.
out to 1000 yards if you do your part.