Wealthy business owners would have been most likely to live in the suburbs.
Wealthy business owners would have been most likely to live in the suburbs.
Middle-class families looking for more space and a quieter lifestyle away from city centers would have been most likely to live in the suburbs. The suburbs offered a sense of community, access to schools and amenities, and often lower crime rates compared to urban areas.
You would survey 55 people if you survey 1 out of every 10 people in a group of 550.
A group typically consists of three or more people. However, some definitions might consider two people as a group if they share a common purpose or identity.
Three questions that need to be asked would be: What group of people (religion, ethnicity, etc.) is being defined? How many people (population) are there in the defined group? Where are the people located (percentages) who are in the defined group?
People began moving from city centers to suburbs in the 1920s due to factors such as increased automobile ownership, improved transportation infrastructure, desire for more space and privacy, availability of affordable homes, and perception of suburbs as safer and healthier environments for raising families.
Civically is the adverb form of the word civic.An example sentence is: "they are a group of civicallyminded people".
Wealthy business owners would have been most likely to live in the suburbs.
Wealthy business owners would have been most likely to live in the suburbs.
Wealthy business owners would have been most likely to live in the suburbs.
Wealthy business owners would have been most likely to live in the suburbs.
suburbs
Young people and their parents would likely lobby the government for money for college.
'the front' was if you were at war you were would be in the first trench or or first group of people to fight and you would be likely to die
Young people and their parents
Young people and their parents
merchants
People would often travel to Mexico in caravans. Caravans are groups of people going to a place in a group. They did this so that bandits or robbers would most likely notice the large group and not bother them.
It is likely that once the untruth was discovered-which it most likely would be, considering the varying sources of information people now have-the lobbyist would be discredited. Because the group had such an untrustworthy spokesperson, the group could be considered untrustworthy as a whole.