The new government needs to balance order & liberty.
One idea that most of the founding fathers agreed on, despite their differences, was the notion of protecting individual liberty and limited government. They believed in the importance of creating a system of checks and balances to prevent the abuse of power, and sought to establish a government that respected and protected individual rights and freedoms. This commitment to individual liberty and limited government is reflected in the United States Constitution and its amendments.
No. Michael Montagne
The continental congress disagreed on the relationship with England. Most delegates believed that the relationship needed a big change will others felt things should remain the same.
That's a really good question. It has to do with people in general. No two people will agree about everything. Compromise is important when setting up a new nation so that you can start our peacefully.
George Mason actually had three pages of handwritten objections, but the main ones were: 1. The Constitution as originally drafted did not contain a declaration of rights. The Bill of Rights was added later. 2. The powers of the President and Senate were dangerously extensive. 3. The Vice President as President of the Senate combined the executive and legislative branches to a degree that would endanger the concept of separation of powers of the three branches of government. ("Miracle at Philadelphia- The Story of the Constitutional Convention" by Catherine Drinker Bowen.)
Our forefathers set up the Checks and Balances system. The three branches of government. The Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Not one of them has more power than the other. It takes two of them to agree to overturn a decision. Even the President can not change a vote or an outcome of one of the other branches without approval of another branch.
Not all of them did. A number of delegates left the convention because they could not support the constitution that was taking shape. For those who did stay though, the answer is a profound willingness to compromise. Michael Montagne
the country needed a new national government .
No. Michael Montagne
You can't, and nobody should try, to presume what the founding fathers would've thought. Instead just understand that they would agree with your right to defend yourself and to have a say in your country.
The continental congress disagreed on the relationship with England. Most delegates believed that the relationship needed a big change will others felt things should remain the same.
The Anti-Federalists made a condition that they would only agree to the Constitution if there where a Bill of Rights. The Founding Fathers were men of their word and it was done.
Mr. Hoo and Grace Wexler agree to collaborate in solving the Westing game mystery, despite their initial differences and suspicions. They work together to uncover the clues and ultimately discover the truth behind the game.
The states were in existence before the federal government, and in fact had to ratify the Constitution before it could take effect. Since the states were all essentially sovereign, independent nations, the Founding Fathers could not have done anything without their agreement. In order to get them to accept the Constitution, the state governments of course had to share power with a limited federal government; otherwise they would never have ratified the Constitution, and the United States would not exist.
That's a really good question. It has to do with people in general. No two people will agree about everything. Compromise is important when setting up a new nation so that you can start our peacefully.
Blacks, who still hate the nation to this day so that was a good call. They were slaves, the only people enslaved in history who never got over it. Native Americans weren't included, either. I don't agree with that one. Indians are cool.
The question itself is not very fair. The founding fathers grew up in a time where male superiority was unquestioned. Most did not believe in votes for women due to the fact that it was not demanded or requested until a later time period. Most did not even address the sufferage movement. But, John Adams ( the first vice president) responded to a letter from his wife where he did not agree with the votes for women movement. In fact he discouraged his wife from pursuing the movement because of the political turmoil that was occurring (due to the Revolutionary War) and America did not need any more division between its citizens. They were probably neutral, but they weren't for it. That's for sure.
It was always a matter of who had the reins of the nation in their hands, the big states or the little states. The concept of shared power for a common good was just a wee bit obscure even for America's great founding fathers.