m4
<><><>
You would have to define better. The M4 has a greater range, the AK a heavier bullet, the M4 a faster bullet, you can carry more ammo for an M4, the AK needs less maintenance, the M4 has a higher rate of fire- and so on.
m4 it has a better rate of fire.
Depends on your intended purpose.
The AK 47 Is Better Then m4
An M4 carbine would be better under almost all circumstances. It is lighter, more accurate at range (Assuming both have their stock sights), and more controllable in full auto mode. However, the AK47 is a cold war-era weapon while the M4A1 are much more modern. A more debatable and relevant question would be "Which is better, an M4 or an AK74?"
Well first off, I'm gonna head to the category everyone wants in a good gun. This is probably the most important thing when comparing guns. In this category it is no contest. The M4 blows the AK47 out of the water in this. Next we turn to reliabilty. Where the M4 struggles. The AK47 can shoot in any condition you throw at it. The M4 has had a little bit of trouble. Now we turn to attachments. In this, the AK47 again fails to compete with its rival. Now I give the final answer. What's better? The M4. Why? It's simple. When I think of the AK47, I think of an overrated, not so good gun. It's reliable, but you can't attach much to an AK. Another thing that helps bring it down is it's accuracy problems. When fighting, you want a nice accurate gun. Every shot you miss the target exposes you more. They are also pretty equal in terms of firepower. The answer is simple. The M4.
In very general terms, the AK will handle harsh environments better with less user maintenance. The M4 is more accurate at longer ranges. Which is better depends on you and your needs. __________________________________________________ This contributor has fired an AK47 variant (Finnish Valmet) and it is accurate out to 500 meters. The AK is heavy as hell, but it is rugged, reliable, and nearly unbreakable. If the M4 is more accurate at longer ranges, it is probably because of improved ammunition.
m4,m16,ak47
An M4 carbine would be better under almost all circumstances. It is lighter, more accurate at range (Assuming both have their stock sights), and more controllable in full auto mode. However, the AK47 is a cold war-era weapon while the M4A1 are much more modern. A more debatable and relevant question would be "Which is better, an M4 or an AK74?"
The gun that it is modeled after is not that important. The main issue is who makes the gun you want to buy. If it is a really cheap brand you will probably get a gun that the trigger will fall off of in about a day, no matter what stile the gun is. If it is a nice brand though than you will get a nice gun that works reliably and its up to your taste as to whether you get the AK47 or the M4.
In terms of most magazines on popular models such as the m16, m4, ak47, etc... yes.
The M4 CARBINE IS BETTER THAN THE M16.
not very much but a bit louder and has a thicker "BAM!" than the M4 (5.56) and guns with 7.62x51 nato are louder than AK-47.
The ak74 is deffinetaly the better choice better rate of fire and better accuracy. However 1 bullet of the ak47 does more damage than 1 bullet of the ak74. So ak47 is mainly for hitpoints and ak 74 is better for fire rate and accuracy.
Both are very powerful, But the AK47 is more. The m16 has better accuracy tho.