In terms of raw performance, an equally priced Turion will outperform a Celeron.
The AMD Turion 64 MK38 processor out performs the Intel Celeron M 440 processor due to its multiple cores and higher clock speed. However, the Celeron M 440 uses up less power and produces less heat.
AMD turion
D is better as it has dual core function
depends what its in the turion is a mobile processor so if ur gettin a laptop get the turion, if ur gettin a desktop get the athlon
it seems celeron is better unless Pentium has 2 cores
No doubt that amd turion x2 is better than athlon x2. So, I would suggest you to go for turion. But I want to know if core 2 duo is better than the turion x2. Any suggestions.
A Celeron processor. Some Celeron processors are somewhat powerful, however Atom processors are slower, intended for basic use in ultra-mobile machines such as netbooks.
Turion
Depends on what their Clock Speed Is, Clock Speed Is measured in GHz, the higher the number the better the processor. For Instance an Intel Core 2 Duo could have a clock speed of 2.00 GHz and that would be better than a AMD Turion Clock speed of 1.73 GHz.
non!!! Intel celeron is better than Intel Pentium dual core
Celeron doesn't refer to any particular processor series. Celerons were cost-reduced versions of their Pentium equivalents. The Celeron in question could be based on a Pentium 2, Pentium 3, Pentium 4, Pentium D, or Core 2 Duo. In which case the answers would be "Pentium 3, Usually Pentium 3, Celeron, Celeron, and Celeron", respectively.
Turion for the fact that Turions' are energy efficient so you can go longer on the same battery charge compared to a phenom.