The GeForce GTX series is the highest series in NVIDIA's line (NVIDIA's flagship card is the GTX 295). Therefore the GTX 260M is better.
MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680. gpuboss . com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-970-vs-GeForce-GTX-680
gainward geforce gtx 560 ti
The GTS 250 is much better. The GTS 250 is similar to a 9800 GTX.
Yes!
well in my opinion... I WANT THE NVIDIA GTX 260 SO GIVE IT 2 ME 4 FREE OR I KILL UR MOM!
Nvidia 9800GX2 Nvidia GTX 295 Nvidia GTX 285 ATi 4870X2 ATi 4890
the 9800gtx is better
No. With NVIDIA's naming system, the higher the number, the better it is (although cards that have a prefix like GT and GTX are higher than simple numbered series).
The Superclocked because they all are pretty much identical but the superclocked has higher clocked speeds on everything by a lil bit. Superclocked cards are usually the best in their series.
Yes, if you are referring on putting two 295 gtx on a crossfire motherboard, but you can get an equivalent by doing SLI on Nvidia motherboards, simply that NVIDIA = SLI while ATI = crossfire.
Nvidia is currently the leader in gpu performance with the GTX 560 I personally have dealt with both companies I tend to stick to Nvidia seeing as about a month ago my Overclocked GTX 8600 died so I decided to buy a Xfx ati raedeon 5770 HD and that was DOA right out of the box so I traded it in for an Nvidia GTX 460 and the second I installed it it worked just fine Nvidia has always had the faster shader clocks allong with core clocks but you can't beat atis for the price I mean the gtx was like $260 while the raedeon was $180 it's always about preference and budget the best manufacturers are gonna be Nvidias actual cards (not like pny's or bfg tech's) or EVGA if ur going Nvidia. If ur going ati then XFX or Asus.