In terms of performance, they can be equal, since both can be integrated into the kernel. A GUI will likely consume more resources, but on a fast enough system, this would be negligible. The real issue is the speed it takes to perform a certain action. For most purposes, a CLI will be faster to input data. A GUI is sometimes better for non-repetitive but highly complex tasks - like editing video or 3D modeling.
Not much similarity, however from GUI you can do anything which can be done by CLI.. This is not possible with CLI to do as GUI..
CLI is Command Line Interface GUI is Graphical User Interface CLI - You type commands into a prompt and the computer executes them. GUI - You use a graphical interface and make selections with the mouse and the computer executes them. CLI example: MS-DOS GUI example: MS Windows XP
CLI and GUI
cli ,mdi,gui
GUI is a Graphical User Interface, which is for making "Windowed" Applications. The CLI is a Command-Line Interface, which is a text prompt in which you can enter specific commands to be executed.
Yes if you are talking of one person.. CLI process is always faster than GUI..
Windows has a GUI and CLI. You use the GUI pretty much all the time. Dump the windows and get a Linux install, try ubuntu and get used to using the well structured CLI. The GUI will make more sense then in general.
gui and cli
Cli gui
Once upon a time, all computers were controlled by typing instructions. There was no GUI 'Graphic User Interface' as on modern computers. Whilst there is nothing wrong in using GUI entirely, some users would rather use the CLI 'Command Line Interface' on a terminal, either entirely or partly. Provided the user knows the code to type, it is often faster using CLI than the mouse and GUI.
The difference between graphic user interface and character user interface are its command. GUI does not need any type of command to interact with the computer, while CUI needs commands in order to interact with the computer.
Because it does not supports GUI and we can only work on CLI in DOS..