0
Which is more helpful proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
To do it right
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which is more helpful- proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?
it depend if the hypothesis is good or wrong. depends if the hypothesis is correct. An hypothesis is, in simple terms, a "guess" based on observed data. For this reason, the data to support any hypothesis can be manipulated to prove it either "right" or "wrong". Neither is more helpful. All scientific endeavour should be tested and retested.
What is a bad hypothesis or a wrong hypothesis?
there is never really a wrong hypothesis because its basically just a guess....
Why is rejection of hypothesis helpful to scientists?
That is progress, you start with a hypothesis, e.g. the moon is made of cheese, then it is tested by experiments to see if it's right. If the experiment says it's wrong, that is something that does not have to be tested again.
Should you ever modify a hypothesis?
You can modify it(if u think it your hypothesis is wrong). However,a hypothesis is actually a guess of the result.Thus, it has no right or wrong in your hypothesis.
What happens to a hypothesis when something is wrong?
the Hypothesis would probably be also wrong but its okay because a hypothesis is a educated guess
Which is more helpful proving a hypothises wrong or supporting a hypothisis?
Proving a hypothesis wrong is more helpful because then you know what is incorrect for next time or someone else.
Which is more helpful- proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?
it depend if the hypothesis is good or wrong. depends if the hypothesis is correct. An hypothesis is, in simple terms, a "guess" based on observed data. For this reason, the data to support any hypothesis can be manipulated to prove it either "right" or "wrong". Neither is more helpful. All scientific endeavour should be tested and retested.
What does it mean to say that if a hypothesis is scientific then there must be means of proving that it was wrong?
kkk
What does it mean to say that if a hypothesis is scientific then there must be a means of proving it wrong?
Your grammar.......
How can rejecting be just as valuable or more valuable than supporting a hypothesis?
Rejecting a hypothesis shows you that it was wrong and it shows you what not to do. It can help lead you to a better, more accurate hypothesis the next time.
What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What is a bad hypothesis or a wrong hypothesis?
there is never really a wrong hypothesis because its basically just a guess....
Why is rejection of hypothesis helpful to scientists?
That is progress, you start with a hypothesis, e.g. the moon is made of cheese, then it is tested by experiments to see if it's right. If the experiment says it's wrong, that is something that does not have to be tested again.
How has religion changed over time because of science?
Many religions have been changed overtime by scientific facts either supporting them or proving them wrong. For example, many scientists believe and support the hypothesis of evolution. Proven evidence may change the way someone looks on their own religion. If scientists found the holy grail and all other sorts of artifacts people would believe in Christianity more because of the evidence supporting it.
What is Rejected Hypothesis?
It is when you know that your hypothesis is wrong.
Should you ever modify a hypothesis?
You can modify it(if u think it your hypothesis is wrong). However,a hypothesis is actually a guess of the result.Thus, it has no right or wrong in your hypothesis.
What happens to a hypothesis when something is wrong?
the Hypothesis would probably be also wrong but its okay because a hypothesis is a educated guess
