0
they were care about individual civil rights
siren44
Lisandro Veum
Duvan Bezuidenhout
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is true of loyalty boards in 1950's?
Loyalty boards used personal information obtained by the government.
What is true about loyalty boards in the 1950s?
they disregarded individuals civil rights
What is true about the creation of the loyalty boards?
they did not care about individual civil rights
What is true of loyalty boards in the 19950's?
There is no historical reference to "loyalty boards" in the 1950s. It's possible you may be referring to loyalty oaths or loyalty programs that were implemented during the Cold War era in the United States to identify and exclude perceived communists or subversives from government positions.
What is true of loyalty boards?
They did not care about individual rights
The loyalty boards were created?
After the loyalty boards were created hundreds of federal workers lost their jobs while thousands more resigned.
What was true of Loyalty Boards of the 1950s?
-They used personal information obtained by the fbi -They used secret evidence -They disregarded individual civil rights
Who were the loyalty boards created by?
President Harry S. Truman created the loyalty boards with Executive Order 9835 on Mar. 21, 1947.
What it's the loyalty boards were created?
Loyalty boards were created to recognize and reward customer loyalty by providing tangible benefits or incentives for repeat patronage. They help businesses build lasting relationships with their customers and encourage repeat business. Loyalty boards can also serve as a platform for personalized marketing and targeted promotions.
Why were The loyalty boards were created?
by an order of president truman
What were loyalty boards?
To test citizens, to see if they were loyal to their respective country.
What was the result of the creation of the loyalty boards?
The loyalty boards created during World War I were intended to promote national unity and support for the war effort. They were volunteer groups that encouraged patriotism and discouraged dissent. However, they also led to some backlash and censorship of free speech, with critics arguing they infringed on civil liberties.
