C#
No. C is not object oriented. C++ is object oriented.
Machine code, assembly language and C are all non-object oriented programming languages. Fortran, COBOL, Pascal and BASIC were originally non-object oriented languages but there are now object-oriented variants of these languages. C++, C# and Java were all designed with object-oriented programming in mind from the outset.
C isn't an object oriented language... C++ is, because it has classes.
Java is the complete object oriented Programming Language as every thing in java is an object,
No, but C++ is.
Object-Oriented languages
Set/subset: Some high level programming languages are object oriented, but not all of them.
C is a weakly typed procedural programming language. For object oriented programming languages near C, you can look at ooc ( http://ooc-lang.org/ ), C++, D, and Java.
I think there is no any difference between object oriented programming language. Because somebody have written that vb is object based language because there is no inheritance, but javascript has no classes and no inheritance but javascript is also object oriented scripting language and java is also object oriented language vb has no inheritance but classes is.So vb is object based language This is not clear that difference between object oriented and object based. if i am wrong than what should be your answer and if i am wright than no problem But first i am requesting to the developer of any programming language that please define the difference between object oriented and object based languages. Amit Sinha Dist-Gaya State-Bihar
Abstraction, encapsulation and polymorphismare the three fundamental features of an object oriented programming language.
because it is non-procedural language, in this language object oriented languages are use to develop software application.
The languages C# and Ruby are notable for their pure object oriented design. You can even call instance functions on literals, such as 10.to_s (Ruby) or 10.ToString() (C#). Other object-oriented designs tend to treat primitives as non-objects, such as in Java, and are therefore not technically "100%" object-oriented.