For materials that are brittle rather than ductile. For ductile :max shear stress theory would be more suitable
All materials that are ductile can use principal stress theory; that is, those that have a yield point and rather large elongation before failure. Most metals fall in this category.
There are twp types of materials that are used in maximum stress theory. The two theories are brittle and ductile.
The correspondence principle has applications to macroscopic events in the everyday macro-world. This principle is a general rule not only good for science but for all good theory - even in areas as far removed from science as government, religion, and ethics. If a new theory is valid, it must account for the verified results of the old theory.
More than 150 years the theory of Proust was considered generally valid; but now the rule of definite proportions is not generally applicable. The Proust law can be considered as a particular case of the Berthollet principle.
Yes. As far as I am aware, no exceptions are known.
This postulate is valid today only in some situations.
depending on the type of cohesive you need but epoxy may be valid for most cases
There is confusion over this because "law" and "theory" mean very different things in every day life compared to science. A "law" is just an outdated term for "theory." Theories are explanations of a phenomenon that have undergone rigorous experiments by scientists. A law is no more scientifically valid than a theory in science. A principle is usually more specific than a theory. For instance, you have the Theory of Quantum Mechanics and within that, you have Pauli's exclusion principle.
The correspondence principle has applications to macroscopic events in the everyday macro-world. This principle is a general rule not only good for science but for all good theory - even in areas as far removed from science as government, religion, and ethics. If a new theory is valid, it must account for the verified results of the old theory.
It is valid
Yes, in theory. But it is only valid up to a certain point of stress, after which the molecular bonds starts to break down. In reality, some materials are so difficult to stretch (so brittle) that it is almost impossible to apply Hooke's law to them. (Our school teacher use to say: dunk a biscuit into tea and then try to stretch it)
it is not valid for hydrogen
More than 150 years the theory of Proust was considered generally valid; but now the rule of definite proportions is not generally applicable. The Proust law can be considered as a particular case of the Berthollet principle.
Roger Valid has written: 'The nonlinear theory of shells through variational principles' -- subject(s): Variational principles, Nonlinear theories, Shells (Engineering) 'The principle of virtual work and associated variational principles' -- subject(s): Shell theory, Structural analysis, Continuum mechanics, Variational principles
why caveat emptor principal is not fully valid in the present scenario
when it is consistent with observation
Guessing, inventing data.
when the principle die the irrevocable power of attorney is valid or invalid
Yes. As far as I am aware, no exceptions are known.