Want this question answered?
A star
A star
molecular cloud
Nuclear fusion affects stellar evolution by essentially halting all mitosis and miosis that any cells in a stellar evolution could experience, and they stunt the growth of the object.
It isn't a star unless it can sustain fusion. We might call such an object a "failed star", but unless it can sustain fusion it isn't a star at all.
A star
A star
molecular cloud
The Sun is the object. Nuclear fusion is the process.
Nuclear fusion affects stellar evolution by essentially halting all mitosis and miosis that any cells in a stellar evolution could experience, and they stunt the growth of the object.
No. A star is an object in space that produces heat and light through nuclear fusion. Stars are not living things.
the path followed by one object as it revolves around another is called
It isn't a star unless it can sustain fusion. We might call such an object a "failed star", but unless it can sustain fusion it isn't a star at all.
This question is a contradiction.
A planet cannot become a star. A star is an object that is massive enough to release energy via nuclear fusion. A planet is much less massive.
A, the Sun; B, the hydrogen bomb; C, Fusion [tokamak] reactors - not to be "functional" until 2040. _________________________________________________________________
A nuclear resource is a special element that is ran through a nuclear reactor to power or propel and object. It is an object that appears as if it is radioactive or made from a nuclear element ran through reactors or still running .