This is very interesting. It could be argued that we really don't observe any of the moon's true motion. We don't observe the moon's axial rotation, even though we know that it happens. The swaying of the moon by libration is an apparent motion and not a true motion. This libration has to do with things like the moon's elliptical orbit around the earth, and the fact that its rotational velocity is just about constant. There is another libration that is related to the eccentricities of the moon's orbit relative to the earth's. The moon appears to rise in the east and set in the west, as does the sun, but this orbital motion is apparent and not true. The moon is orbiting the earth in the other direction. It appears to rise in the east and set in the west only because of the earth's very fast axial rotation. The earth rotates once each day, and the moon orbits the earth once in a lunar cycle. This means that the moon's true orbital motion around the earth can be seen only indirectly.
BARKKKKKKKK
no moon bars are not real.
The Apollo moon landing in 1969 was real.
There was no moon hoax. The moon landings were real.
No
They were all quite real.
Apparent solubility represents the solubility one observed during the experiment while the intrinsic solubility meant to the real or true solubility.
Real means existing in fact Apparent means obvious
An eclipse is a natural phenomenon. A solar eclipse is an optical illusion caused by the fact that our sun and moon are almost the same apparent size; whereas a lunar eclipse happens because sometimes the moon's orbit takes it directly into the Earth's shadow.So yes, eclipses are real.
no moon bars are not real.
Real depth Dr= Apparent depth/ refractive index of water Dr= Da / n water
You braid/ Cornrow your hair in circular motions.
its apparent depth is 1.5m.
The Apollo moon landing in 1969 was real.
There was no moon hoax. The moon landings were real.
They are spelled differently.
That's the first thing that can be observed about a star. You can't immediately figure out a star's real (absolute) brightness; this requires a more detailed analysis, and for far-away stars it may be difficult to get this information with a reasonable accuracy.
No