answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

many colonists had become wealthy at a time when britain did not have much wealth.

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

This question needs more context in order to be answered; it contains a question referring to a multiple choice list which is not included in the question. Try re-phrasing the question.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which of these facts supported the British argument the colonist should pay higher taxes?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Which of these supported the British argument that colonists should pay higher taxes?

Many colonists had become wealthy at a time when britian did not have much wealth.


What facts supported the British argument that colonists should pay higher taxes?

Many colonists had become wealthy at a time when Britain did not have much wealth.


When did the Colonists start being taxed at a higher rate than subjects in England?

After the French and Indian war the colonist started being taxed at higher rates than the people in England. The British began taxing the colonists in 1763.


What British goods did the Colonists boycott?

Actually, they didn't boycott goods as much as it seems. They did what we would do and that is to look for the cheaper price. One of the goods involved was tea. Many goods the colonist bought were from colonial smugglers because they were cheaper. When the British lowed the price of the tea it made the Dutch tea higher in price so the smugglers were loosing money. Two of the biggest smugglers were Hancock and Hamilton . Hancock supported, organizesd and paid for the Son's of Liberty. This was an economic issue and the smugglers were fighting for their lives.


What was the name of the radical group founded by Samuel Adams in response to higher British taxes?

Son's of Liberty. They were formed by Adams who was one of the biggest smugglers in the colonies. The British LOWERED the tea tax which made the smuggled Dutch tea higher in price than the English. The smugglers were protecting their business and income when they threw the tea in the harbor.

Related questions

What supported the British argument that colonists should pay higher taxes?

Many colonists had become wealthy at a time when Britain did not have much wealth.


Which of these supported the British argument that colonists should pay higher taxes?

Many colonists had become wealthy at a time when britian did not have much wealth.


Of these facts supported the british argument that colonists should pay higher taxes?

many colonists had become wealthy at a time when Britain did not have much wealth


What facts supported the British argument that colonists should pay higher taxes?

Many colonists had become wealthy at a time when Britain did not have much wealth.


Did colonist pay higher or lower taxes after the French and Indian war?

Higher!!


When did the Colonists start being taxed at a higher rate than subjects in England?

After the French and Indian war the colonist started being taxed at higher rates than the people in England. The British began taxing the colonists in 1763.


What British goods did the Colonists boycott?

Actually, they didn't boycott goods as much as it seems. They did what we would do and that is to look for the cheaper price. One of the goods involved was tea. Many goods the colonist bought were from colonial smugglers because they were cheaper. When the British lowed the price of the tea it made the Dutch tea higher in price so the smugglers were loosing money. Two of the biggest smugglers were Hancock and Hamilton . Hancock supported, organizesd and paid for the Son's of Liberty. This was an economic issue and the smugglers were fighting for their lives.


Why did the colonists boycott british goods?

Actually, they didn't boycott goods as much as it seems. They did what we would do and that is to look for the cheaper price. One of the goods involved was tea. Many goods the colonist bought were from colonial smugglers because they were cheaper. When the British lowed the price of the tea it made the Dutch tea higher in price so the smugglers were loosing money. Two of the biggest smugglers were Hancock and Hamilton . Hancock supported, organizesd and paid for the Son's of Liberty. This was an economic issue and the smugglers were fighting for their lives.


Who participated in the boycott of british goods in colonial America?

Actually, they didn't boycott goods as much as it seems. They did what we would do and that is to look for the cheaper price. One of the goods involved was tea. Many goods the colonist bought were from colonial smugglers because they were cheaper. When the British lowed the price of the tea it made the Dutch tea higher in price so the smugglers were loosing money. Two of the biggest smugglers were Hancock and Hamilton . Hancock supported, organizesd and paid for the Son's of Liberty. This was an economic issue and the smugglers were fighting for their lives.


Why did many colonists boycott British goods?

Actually, they didn't boycott goods as much as it seems. They did what we would do and that is to look for the cheaper price. One of the goods involved was tea. Many goods the colonist bought were from colonial smugglers because they were cheaper. When the British lowed the price of the tea it made the Dutch tea higher in price so the smugglers were loosing money. Two of the biggest smugglers were Hancock and Hamilton . Hancock supported, organizesd and paid for the Son's of Liberty. This was an economic issue and the smugglers were fighting for their lives.


A major argument for economic growth is that it?

leads to a higher standard of living


Was the Tea Act unfair?

Actually, the " colonist" didn't think that. It was a small group of men who were protecting their own economic interest. The British had LOWERED the tax on tea and this made the price of the tea smuggled into the colonies higher than the British. The smugglers were upset and two of the biggest smugglers in the colonies were Hamilton and Hancock. Hancock was very wealthy and he funded/supported the Son's of Liberty. Without him there would have been no Sam Adams nor the Son's of Liberty, but the whole purpose was to protect his economic interests. The people in the colonies paid LESS taxes than people in England paid.