Want this question answered?
No he did not.
Can't really say for sure, but I believe it was between 1646 and 1649, when Rembrandt was still painting portrait of clients in his house on the Breestraat, quit a few years before he lost his house in bankruptcy court. Rembrandt loved that monkey, including his son Titus and his mistress Hendrickje also like that monkey. Rembrandt had included that monkey in at least four painting that I know of personally. One of them was mentioned by Holbreaken, a Rembrandt historian who stated it was a known fact Rembrandt painted his dead monkey into a unfinished work of a family portrait. An earlier biographers, Filippo Baldinucci, who based his writings on the testimony of one of Rembrandt's pupils also said something to this effect. It was refused by of the head of the house hold who jump around the painting before Rembrandt was able to cover it up. Rembrandt refused to remove it because of liking its effect, and then proceeded to threw the family out of his house, and was said to have left the painting unfinished.You can copy this link below and paste in your browser if you care to see Rembrandt's painting of his dead monkey in this supposed only family portrait of his. Sorry if links are not permitted,... for I'm sure it will be omitted if they are not.Another answer:You may be interested to know that the person who wrote the above answer is the same who asked the question. This to be able to tell the story above, which is not believed by all.
About 1629.
Oil paint on canvas. The Metropolitan Museum now classifies this painting as 'Style of Rembrandt'.
In Glasgow's Kelvingrove Art Gallery
Danaë - Rembrandt painting - was created in 1636.
Does not sound like Rembrandt painting.
No he did not.
Just painting and etching.
Can't really say for sure, but I believe it was between 1646 and 1649, when Rembrandt was still painting portrait of clients in his house on the Breestraat, quit a few years before he lost his house in bankruptcy court. Rembrandt loved that monkey, including his son Titus and his mistress Hendrickje also like that monkey. Rembrandt had included that monkey in at least four painting that I know of personally. One of them was mentioned by Holbreaken, a Rembrandt historian who stated it was a known fact Rembrandt painted his dead monkey into a unfinished work of a family portrait. An earlier biographers, Filippo Baldinucci, who based his writings on the testimony of one of Rembrandt's pupils also said something to this effect. It was refused by of the head of the house hold who jump around the painting before Rembrandt was able to cover it up. Rembrandt refused to remove it because of liking its effect, and then proceeded to threw the family out of his house, and was said to have left the painting unfinished.You can copy this link below and paste in your browser if you care to see Rembrandt's painting of his dead monkey in this supposed only family portrait of his. Sorry if links are not permitted,... for I'm sure it will be omitted if they are not.Another answer:You may be interested to know that the person who wrote the above answer is the same who asked the question. This to be able to tell the story above, which is not believed by all.
About 1629.
Oil paint on canvas. The Metropolitan Museum now classifies this painting as 'Style of Rembrandt'.
J. M. Nash has written: 'The age of Rembrandt and Vermeer; Dutch painting in the seventeenth century' -- subject(s): Dutch Painting, Modern Painting 'The age of Rembrandt and Vermeer' -- subject(s): Dutch Painting
About 1624, counting the ones existing today.
It is not possible to compare music and painting.
The painting is in The Hermitage Museum in Saint Petersburg.
It is a painting by Rembrandt. See the link below.