If you mean: in the USA, the answer is the Republican Party.
republicans
democratic
the diversity of views represented in a multiparty system can be seen as a weakness because it often may lead to instability in government, it might be seen as a strength because it gives voters a much more meaningful choice among candidates and policy alternatives then the present two-party system.
When this question was first asked, there was still a close race between Senator Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton; but ultimately, Sec. Clinton got more votes and more delegates, which meant that she won the Democratic Party nomination. While she has been seen as more conservative than Mr. Sanders, Mrs. Clinton's voting record as a senator was generally center-left, and she has a long history of support for progressive causes. But on some issues, such as national security, she is certainly considered conservative. It remains to be seen whether that will be a problem or an asset for her in the 2016 presidential election.
Mark Zuckerberg's political views are often seen as more aligned with liberal ideals, particularly in areas such as technology regulation, immigration, and social issues. He has supported progressive initiatives and expressed concern over misinformation and privacy issues. However, like many individuals in prominent positions, his views can vary on different topics, making it difficult to label him strictly as either a liberal or a conservative.
The Tea Party is very similar to the Constitution Party. More so than the GOP. The only difference I can think of would surround foreign policy. The Tea Party's views on foreign policy are "strengthen the military while reducing military commitments." This is considered limited interventionism...as opposed to Non-Interventionism as seen with the Constitution Party.
No party has a solid foothold in Colorado and the leadership regularly rotates. Boulder is considered a liberal stronghold and Colorado Springs is a hotbed of conservative ideology. It is seen as a swing state.
Rupert Murdoch is generally considered to be aligned with the Republican Party, particularly due to his ownership of media outlets like Fox News, which has a conservative slant and often supports Republican candidates and policies. However, he has also expressed independent views on various issues and has supported political figures across the spectrum at different times. Overall, while he has significant ties to the Republican Party, his political affiliations can be seen as more complex and nuanced.
the diversity of views represented in a multiparty system can be seen as a weakness because it often may lead to instability in government, it might be seen as a strength because it gives voters a much more meaningful choice among candidates and policy alternatives then the present two-party system.
Yes she has been seen smoking at a party and more
Barry Goldwater, the Republican candidate, lost the 1964 presidential election in a landslide to Lyndon B. Johnson, the Democratic candidate. Goldwater's conservative views, particularly on issues such as civil rights and nuclear weapons, were seen as too extreme by many voters, contributing to his overwhelming defeat.
Libertarian. Rupert Murdock is without doubt a conservative. More than that, he is a businessman and promotes his interest. That being said conservatives by nature or more commercially profitable than progressives, his interest would be profits, therefore he would promote conservative agenda. If that is not enough he directly gave the Republican National Convention a $1 million dollar donation a few years ago, although he does give to both parties, by a considerable amount more to the Republican party. I do not believe he "lives or dies" by conservative values because the ideas of conservatism vary greatly from country to country. A US conservative would never get elected in the UK because would be seen as a right wing extremist; on the flip side the US would not elect a UK conservative because they are not conservative enough. Bottom line: He is a conservative because it is more profitable.