the answer is bjp- bhartiya janta party and i am pretty sure about it
That is when political party and philosophy runs the government.
Single-party rule
Yes, as a rule.
If we restrict ourselves to parties which are nationally represented (as opposed to local parties) then there are currently twelve active political parties in the Netherlands. These are: People's Party for Freedom and Democracy Labour Party Party for Freedom Socialist Party Christian Democratic Appeal Democrats 66 Christian Union GreenLeft Reformed Political Party Party for Animals 50PLUS Independent Senate Group The government is currently formed by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, which provides the prime minister, Mark Rutte, and the Labour Party. It is impossible for one party to gain a majority on its own and thus rule on its own; all governments consist of at least two parties (usually three).
Totalitarianism Yes, a one party state.
As far as I understand he didn't belong to a political party, and what party he would belong to would depend on what country you are in, but if he did have a political affiliation he would be on the far right with the people who believe that a single entity should rule over all.
There no advantages of one party rule. When other political parties are outlawed or new ones forbidden to arise, history has shown these situations to be disasters.
Totalitarianism is the anwer for novanet.
Bolsheviks were a revolutionary political party in early 20th century Russia. They opposed the Romanov autocratic rule.
The reason it is important because, the more of the same party then the more that party will rule like how the democrats are leading.. because Obama is democratic.
The phrase 'de facto' means in ['de'] fact['facto']. A single-party political system may have two or more political parties that theoretically are allowed to name candidates for political office. But that system is 'de facto' when only one party gets its candidates elected.
democratic-republians believed in a strong state government.