No, plants need oxygen and carbon dioxide to live.
If the trees are burned, the carbon dioxide released will raise airborne levels, and greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere. But just cutting down the trees stops their process of REMOVING carbon dioxide from the air, which all green plants do.
Mars and Venus, I guess you could call them our sisters gone wrong.
The carbon cycle is the natural way of moving carbon in and out of the atmosphere. The only way it could be used to slow down global warming would be if we planted billions of trees. Trees use photosynthesis to remove carbon dioxide from the air.
Mercury has no atmosphere to speak of. There are traces of sodium, oxygen, argon, helium, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water and hydrogen floating around' but it's pretty much hard vacuum down to the surface.
Any of these is the answer:Vegetation growthThe planting of more treesAfforestationStopping deforestationEfficient carbon collection and storage plant (CCS)
Well I know that the atmosphere has carbon dioxide in it, and when we breath out we release carbon dioxide that could be then added to the atmosphere.
Because trees remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and if they cut them down we will have more carbon dioxide.
As airline, you can decrease the amount of carbon dioxide. It could decrease the ozone depletion.
It is an abiotic factor as it is not alive.
Reducing temperature increases could be accomplished by reducing the quantity of greenhouse gases In the atmospher , notably carbon dioxide (which is released by the combustion of fuels for energy).
When a tree decomposes, all the carbon dioxide it absorbed is released back into the atmosphere driven by heterotrophic activities.
No, plants need oxygen and carbon dioxide to live.
This is possible only by chemical analysis of atmospheric samples.
so we could have oxygen and so that our carbon dioxide dont fill up the atmosphere
the disadvantage is that they could die out
Mars and Venus, I guess you could call them our sisters gone wrong.