Want this question answered?
In general, the Lorentz force is [ F = q(E + v x B) ].
No. The vectorial definition of Lorentz force isF = q[E + (v x B)]If a particle has no velocity, then the cross product of the velocity vector and the magnetic field vector is the null vector, but there will still be a Lorentz force if there is an electric field.For a particle not to experience Lorentz force, it must either not be electrically charged and/or not be put in an electromagnetic field with a certain velocity.
As far as the electric field is stationary then no magnetic field. But when electric field is moving at a uniform speed then a magnetic field will be produced. This is what we call Lorentz magnetic field.
Fleming's left hand rule that explains Lorentz force would answer your queries
It transforms into a magnetic field.
When a charged particle moves through a magnetic field it experiences the Lorentz force perpendicular to the magnetic fields lines and perpendicular to its direction of motion.The Lorentz equation quantifies the force.F=qE+qvXB, where the vector quantities are in bold. The X refers to the vector cross product operation.In this question, there is no electric field, so this says the force is proportional to the charge, velocity and field strength and the sine of the angle between the velocity and the field.
When a charged particle moves through a magnetic field it experiences the Lorentz force perpendicular to the magnetic fields lines and perpendicular to its direction of motion.The Lorentz equation quantifies the force.F=qE+qvXB, where the vector quantities are in bold. The X refers to the vector cross product operation.In this question, there is no electric field, so this says the force is proportional to the charge, velocity and field strength and the sine of the angle between the velocity and the field.
Werner Nahm has written: 'Conformally invariant quantum field theories in two dimensions' -- subject(s): Conformal invariants, Quantum field theory
It transforms into a magnetic field.
It transforms into a magnetic field.
Robert L. Kirkwood has written: 'Lorentz invariance in a gravitational field' -- subject(s): Gravitation, Lorentz transformations 'The effective directivity of an isotropic antenna looking down through the ionosphere' -- subject(s): Astronautics in meteorology, Ionosphere
Laurens D. Gunnarsen has written: 'A new gauge-invariant Hamiltonian formulation of weak-field general relativity'