That role would be party leader-- the leader of his political party.
Cops or police officers do not have an official political affiliation. They can be either democrats or republicans.
Caucus. Also, caucus is the name given to either a group of all Democrats or a group of all Republicans.
There is not much evidence that they were activists for either party, but by some accounts, they seem to have been moderate Republicans.
Right now it's a repubican presidency, when Obama takes office it will be the democrats
Republicans favor smaller government which means lower taxes, but also less protection of people that do not have money. Democrats favor larger government which means higher taxes, but also a social "safety net" to catch people that lose their job, get injured, etc. As a rule, Republicans are more in favor of "freedom with your own money". Democrats prefer "freedom to do as you please" I am biased and I am a Democrat.
This has been argued by both Democrats and Republicans alike and there is plenty of legislation to solidify either argument. As of right now, as long as the dollar amount is within a certain requirement this is definitely considered a part of exercising an individual's "free speech"
Personally i prefer republics just based on their ideas, but either party is right depending on how you look at social issues.
Among the congressmen, there doesn't seem to be any clear line that either party follows. 65 republicans voted yes, 133 voted no. 140 democrats voted yes, 95 voted no. So, there is no clear attitude, but as you can tell from the voting, the democrats in Congress are generally a bit more positive on the bailout.
As of May 2014, there are 53 Democrats in the US Senate and 45 Republicans. There are also two independents, Bernie Sanders of VT and Angus King of ME, who are not members of either political party. However, they caucus with the Democratic Party, meaning, for purposes of committees and such, they "count as" Democrats.
As of May 2014, there are 53 Democrats in the US Senate and 45 Republicans. There are also two independents, Bernie Sanders of VT and Angus King of ME, who are not members of either political party. However, they caucus with the Democratic Party, meaning, for purposes of committees and such, they "count as" Democrats.
There's nothing that says that an incumbent president (or holder of any other office) is protected against challengers from within his or her own party. At the 1948 Democratic National Convention, there was an attempt to dump Truman (the incumbent Democratic president) in favor of Dwight D. Eisenhower (a Republican, though at the time the Democrats probably did not know this). However, Eisenhower flatly refused to run for either the Democrats or the Republicans, and the Democrats rather reluctantly realigned behind Truman (except for a small minority, the States' Rights Democrats or "Dixiecrats", who split off to support Strom Thurmond; if you've never heard of the Dixiecrats, let's just say they basically supported the US version of Apartheid). That said, the Democrats in 2012 decided not to mount a serious challenge to President Obama, and it turned out okay, since the president won re-election, defeating his Republican challenger Mitt Romney and winning a second term.
Since 1950 the majority party has either been the Democrats or the Republicans. Neither party has held the majority in the Senate for the last 60 years. Currently, the Democrats hold the majority, but, that will probably change sometime in the future as it always had in the past.