An astronomer.
An astronomer or astrophysicist would study the moon, stars, and planets - of course they may study more than just those.
Stellar space, from planets, moons, asteriods to stars, galaxies; The Universe basically
The sun, moon, stars, planets, and other celestial bodies collectively, would be the objects of study for astronomers. They would also be of interest to cosmologists and astrophysicists; there would also be specialists within these disciplines - for example the sun specifically would be of interest to a solar physicist or heliophysicist (or heliologist), planets would be the domain of a planetary scientist or planetary physicist, and so forth.
No. Dwarf planets orbit stars just like planets do. Stars orbit the center of their galaxy. An object orbiting a planet would be a moon.
A person who studies the stars is called an astronomer. They partake in the branch of study that is called astronomy. If he specializes in the physics of the stars, he would be an astrophysicist.
People who study stars are called astronomers. They observe and analyze celestial objects and phenomena, including stars, planets, galaxies, and more, to better understand the universe.
No, a biology major would study bugs...however, astronomers study outer space. (Unless the "powers that be" have changed it or added something.
These people are called Astronomers. Look it up in wikipedia if you want more information.
I would suppose that the scientist with the super powered telescopes would discover planets before the astronauts would.
hyponism :)
A microbiologist.
If there were no stars, the Universe would be devoid of the light, heat, and energy that stars provide. This would drastically alter the formation of galaxies, planets, and the conditions necessary for life to exist. The absence of stars would lead to a dark, cold, and lifeless Universe.