0
What else can I help you with?
Which sultan had the greatest number of slaves in his court?
Sultan Feroze Shah Tughluq had the most slaves in his court. He kept nearly 70,00 people from various countries inslaved.
How did a sultan communicate his desires to the grand vizier?
The Sublime Porte was the name of the open court of the sultan, led by the Grand Vizier. The Grand Vizier had offices there and would communicate with the Sultan there. ChaCha on!
Who was involved in a court dealing with possession and boundaries for slaves?
I am not sure I understand your question, but there was no court for slaves.
What are concubine quarters called?
odas An Oda was a court where the harem or concubines wiated for the Sultan
What did the Supreme Court called slaves?
The Supreme Court referred to slaves as property in the infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857.
How were slaves treated in court?
Slaves would not be treated well as they were seen as common animals without rights
What role did roger taney in determining weather or not slaves could sue in the courts?
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scot was that slaves were property and had no rights. This meant they couldn't sue in court.
What does supreme in supreme court mean?
The greatest
What did the Supreme Court's decision in Dredd Scott originate the concept of?
It originated the concept that former slaves, or descendants of slaves, could never be citizens and therefore couldn't bring cases before the court.
What was Abraham Lincoln's most famous court case?
freeing slaves
What was one of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision Slaves were citizens. Slaves were property. Slavery was illegal. Slavery was a choice each state could make.?
One of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision was that slaves were considered property, not citizens.
What court case said that slaves were property not people?
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857 ruled that slaves were property, not citizens, and therefore could not bring a case to court. The decision further deepened the divide between the North and South on the issue of slavery.
