this is a much more complicated question than perhaps you realise. try looking up "wave particle duality" photons have the strange characteristic of haveing properties of both a wave and a particle.
wave theory can't explain some effects of light. Light photons act as both waves and as particles, very similar as to how electrons behave. Both theory of light and wave theory is correct because each will predict the behavior of light for certain phenomena.
photon theory of light is a theory of photon
Light exhibits both propertied. Neither is more favorable.
Neither. A photon acts like either a particle or a wave, depending on how it is measured. It is a different type of matter, colloquially called a wavicle.
The phenomena of interference of light: Wave theory
The photoelectric effect: Particle theory.
Electromagnetic radiation from exited atom: Particle theory.
It has to do with the wave nature of light.
Photons are theoretical particles.
Photon do not exist in reality. Newton's Corpuscular Theory of light ASSUMES an imaginary particle PHOTON to explain various phenomena of light.
photon
A photon.
A particle of light. Or, in general, of an electromagnetic wave.
UV means ultraviolet, and a photon is a particle of light.
Photon do not exist in reality. Newton's Corpuscular Theory of light ASSUMES an imaginary particle PHOTON to explain various phenomena of light.
No. A photon is a particle of light. It is massless.
photon
A photon.
A particle of light. Or, in general, of an electromagnetic wave.
UV means ultraviolet, and a photon is a particle of light.
That's what we call a "photon".
No it is a light particle.
Photon
Photon
A "photon".
a photon