answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which three authors wrote the the Federalist papers which argued in favor or adopting the constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the original purpose of the federalist papers?

the federalist papers were written as essays that argued a federalist viewpoint on the constitution.


What argued in favor of ratifying the new US Constitution?

The Federalist Papers


Which of the groups argued against the country adopting the constitution as the new government?

anti-federalists


Groups argued against the country adopting the Constitution as the new government?

Anti-Federalists.


A series of newspaper articles that effectively argued for the adoption of the Constitution?

The Federalist Papers


During the debate over the Constitution what party argued for strong independent states?

the anti-federalist party


What arguments did the the federalists make to gain approval of the Constitution?

The Federalist argued that the constitution needed to be ratified in order to correct the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist focused their arguments on the benefits of a national government.


What is the name given to the famous papers written by Hamiliton and Madison and Jay that argued for ratification of the US Constitution?

The Federalist Papers.


What did the federalist argued?

The anti - federalist argued against ratification. They attacked nearly every part of the new document.


The anti-federalist james winthrop argued that a bill of rights was necessary in the constitution because?

it would secure the minority against the usurpation and tyranny of the majority.


How did federalist feel about the constitution?

They argued that the new government would provide a better balance between the national government and state governments. Hope that helps!


Why do we have the amendments?

The First Amendment (known as the Bill of Rights) was a compromise between Federalist states and Anti-Federalist states, therefore allowing the new Constitution to be passed. Anti-Federalist wanted rights and restrictions to be put on the Constitution because there was no guarantee to them. Federalists argued that the rights listed were implied. Obviously the Anti-Federalists got what they wanted.