Want this question answered?
the federalist papers were written as essays that argued a federalist viewpoint on the constitution.
The Federalist Papers
anti-federalists
Anti-Federalists.
The Federalist Papers
the anti-federalist party
The Federalist argued that the constitution needed to be ratified in order to correct the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist focused their arguments on the benefits of a national government.
The Federalist Papers.
The anti - federalist argued against ratification. They attacked nearly every part of the new document.
it would secure the minority against the usurpation and tyranny of the majority.
They argued that the new government would provide a better balance between the national government and state governments. Hope that helps!
The First Amendment (known as the Bill of Rights) was a compromise between Federalist states and Anti-Federalist states, therefore allowing the new Constitution to be passed. Anti-Federalist wanted rights and restrictions to be put on the Constitution because there was no guarantee to them. Federalists argued that the rights listed were implied. Obviously the Anti-Federalists got what they wanted.