Anti-federalists that believed the original constitution gave the government power to infringe upon the rights of man.
in what ways does the bill of rights protect individuals from the power of government
Most of the rights in the Bill of Rights apply as much to states as to the national government. So, it isn't necessary for every state to include each item in its own constitution. Many state constitutions do include these items, whether or not they duplicate national rights. For example, California's state constitution begins with a statement of rights and gives dozens of rights of citizens in detail. Many of these match the Bill of Rights almost exactly. Some rights are unique to California -- citizens have the right to fish upon public lands and waters, for example.
First off, The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, is a statement, a declaration not a set of codified rules upon which laws are based. It was updated in 1793 like you suggest in your question, and used as a base for the French Constitution of 1793 or the Constitution of the Year I. That Constitution was never adopted. It was also the basis for the International human rights instruments, such as theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Or as they are called International Bill of Human Rights. Sadly although these rights have been adopted by the UN, they are not recognized world wide.
The Bill of Rights covers all the United States and federal law supersedes state law.
Both the declaration and the bill of rights are separate documents not based upon each other, regardless if there are referred to each other at one point or another.
The Magna Carta heavily influenced several foundational documents, including the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It established principles such as due process and the rule of law, which are echoed in these American documents. Additionally, the English Bill of Rights of 1689 also drew upon the Magna Carta's ideas about limiting the powers of the monarchy and protecting individual rights.
Magna Carta, and the English Bill of Rights
a form of the Bill of Rights.
Magna Carta, and the English Bill of Rights
There is no guardian of the bill of rights. It is up to the citizens to make sure that their rights are not infringed upon nor taken from them by using due diligence.
Gay people were not specifically considered upon the writing the Constitution, so there aren't any real "Gay rights" in the Bill of Rights. Although, the Bill of Rights still applies, I guess.
Simple answer? Inalienable rights.
Ninth
the bill of rights was formed to not let the government control power or abuse it so the anti federlists said they needed to make a bill of rights
The main issue that the federalists and anti-federalists disagreed upon was the Bill of Rights. The federalists believed that the people should just have the constitution, however the anti-federalists believed in making a bill of rights so the people could see what there rights were.
The bill of rights states rights that cannot be infringed upon the american people. These controls have not been succsefull.