This question makes perfect sense. This question makes no sense at all.
A contradictio in adjecto is a grammatical contradiction where two adjectives in a phrase or sentence contradict each other. An example would be "the frozen fire," as fire cannot be frozen.
A contradiction occurs when two statements or ideas conflict with each other, leading to a logical inconsistency. This means that both statements cannot be true at the same time. In formal logic, a contradiction can invalidate an argument or theory.
In logic, conjunctive means combining two statements with "and" to create a single true statement, while disjunctive means combining two statements with "or" where at least one statement must be true for the combined statement to be true.
A contradiction occurs when two statements cannot both be true at the same time, leading to inconsistency. An argument, on the other hand, involves presenting a claim supported by reasons and evidence to persuade others of its validity or truth. In an argument, the aim is to provide a coherent and logical explanation, while a contradiction highlights an inconsistency or conflict in statements.
An argument is an attempt to persuade someone to see a better, different perspective, a contradiction are two simple statements that cannot both be agreed upon without being hypocritical. An argument is derived from feelings as opposed to simply having a different point of view. Arguing often allows you to support what you're saying you give reason for what you believe in. You can contradict yourself if you dictate something and then prove yourself against what you said. For example I said, "I don't ever wear black shoes," and then the next day I am wearing black shoes. On the other hand an argument involves two or more people going back and forth. They are not the same word and have different meanings you couldn't use both of these words in a sentence to describe the same event. I think if you could contradict a person within your argument, but the contradiction is not the essence of the argument. Additionally, people could agree on certain aspects thereof, which would still qualify it as an argument despite the absence of contradiction.
when two peple are aganst each other
The two testimonies in the court trial were in direct contradiction to each other.
Wanting two things that contradict each other; like attacking a country to pacify it.
It's not that WikiAnswers contradicts itself, it's that WikiAnswers' users contradict each other. WikiAnswers is made up of individual contributors (users), and since everyone has their point of view and their way of knowledge and doing things around here, they tend to contradict each other.It's just two different people's ways of doing things, and sometimes they just happen to contradict each other.
No. An oxymoron are two words together that contradict each other.For example, silent scream."Misspelled" and "word" don't contradict each other, even if it was spelled "mispelled". It's merely ironic.
The answer is 0%. If two of the following are lies, the only two combination of statements that don't contradict each other is B and C which leaves A as the answer - the chicken came first.
No, that is a descriptive adjective. An oxymoron would be two things that contradict each other such as "clean dirt" or dumb Asians.
A rectangular triangle is an oxymoron! A triangle cannot be rectangular and no rectangular shape can be a triangle. The two words contradict each other.
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
That is called an oxymoron, which is a figure of speech that combines contradictory terms for dramatic effect, such as "jumbo shrimp" or "bittersweet."
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
A contradictio in adjecto is a grammatical contradiction where two adjectives in a phrase or sentence contradict each other. An example would be "the frozen fire," as fire cannot be frozen.