Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
The structure of an exposition :purpose:to put forth an argument or particular point of view structure:1. point of view is stated (thesis) 2.justifications of an argment in a logical order3. summary of argument
When revising a draft, a writer should ensure that the supporting details in a paragraph are relevant, coherent, and effectively illustrate the main idea. Each detail should clearly connect back to the topic sentence and enhance the reader's understanding of the argument or narrative. Additionally, it's important to check for variety in the types of supporting details used, such as examples, statistics, or anecdotes, to maintain reader engagement. Lastly, the overall flow and organization of the paragraph should be smooth, allowing for a logical progression of ideas.
There aren't enough details in paragraph 6 to develop the topic :) -Apex-
parallelism
The body of a composition in English is the main part of the written work where the author develops their ideas, presents arguments, and provides supporting evidence. It typically consists of several paragraphs that elaborate on the thesis statement introduced in the introduction. Each paragraph should focus on a single point or aspect, clearly linking back to the main argument to create a cohesive structure. Overall, the body is essential for conveying the message and depth of the composition.
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
A premise that is clearly stated in an argument is a statement or proposition that serves as the foundation for the argument and is presented as a fact or assumption to support the conclusion.
When writing heads of argument, you should outline the main points you will be presenting to support your case. Start by clearly stating your position and then present each argument in a logical and organized manner, supporting them with evidence and legal principles. Make sure to address each key issue in a persuasive and concise way.
When explaining supporting evidence, it's important to clearly state the key point it supports, provide a brief overview of the evidence itself, and clearly connect it back to the main argument or point being made. Use specific examples and data to strengthen your explanation and make sure to address any potential counterarguments or alternative interpretations.
The best organizational pattern for building an argument is the "classical" or "Toulmin" model. This approach typically includes an introduction that presents the claim, followed by supporting evidence, counterarguments, and a rebuttal. By clearly structuring the argument in this way, you can logically persuade your audience and address potential objections. This format helps create a compelling and well-rounded argument.
To construct an effective argument in a debate or discussion, start by clearly stating your position and supporting it with evidence and logical reasoning. Anticipate counterarguments and address them respectfully. Use persuasive language and maintain a confident and respectful demeanor. Practice active listening and be open to changing your position based on new information.
To identify the main idea when it is not clearly stated, look for repeated themes or topics throughout the text, pay attention to the opening and closing paragraphs, and consider the most frequently mentioned point or argument. Additionally, analyzing the supporting details and examples can help to infer the main idea of the text.
the defense of Russuain
To form a logically coherent argument using the ideas provided, start by clearly stating your main claim or thesis. Then, present each supporting idea with relevant evidence or reasoning to back it up. Ensure there is a logical flow between your points and address any potential counterarguments. Conclude by summarizing your main points and reinforcing why your argument is valid.
transparent
No, the word 'clearly' is an adverb, because it describes an action.Example: "I can see clearly when I wear my classes."
In an argument, explicit statements are those that are clearly articulated and directly stated by the speaker or writer. These statements provide the main points or premises upon which the argument is based, and are typically used to support the argument's conclusion. Explicit statements help to make the argument's reasoning transparent and coherent.