A premise that is clearly stated in an argument is a statement or proposition that serves as the foundation for the argument and is presented as a fact or assumption to support the conclusion.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
A premise in an argument is a statement or proposition that serves as the basis for the conclusion of the argument. It is presented as a reason or evidence to support the conclusion that the arguer is trying to establish. Premises are essential in constructing sound and valid arguments.
Not necessarily. An argument is not automatically true just because the premise and conclusion are true. The reasoning connecting the premise to the conclusion must also be valid for the argument to be considered true.
In an argument, explicit statements are those that are clearly articulated and directly stated by the speaker or writer. These statements provide the main points or premises upon which the argument is based, and are typically used to support the argument's conclusion. Explicit statements help to make the argument's reasoning transparent and coherent.
A deductive argument with two premises is called a syllogism. In a syllogism, one premise is the major premise, another is the minor premise, and they lead to a conclusion.
An explicit premise is a statement in an argument that is clearly and directly stated, serving as a foundational component for reasoning. It lays out a specific assertion that supports the conclusion of the argument. Unlike implicit premises, which are assumed and not directly expressed, explicit premises are openly articulated, making the argument's structure more transparent and understandable.
A suppressed premise is not explicitly stated in an argument but is assumed to be understood by the audience. While it can be valid if it logically supports the conclusion, the overall validity of the argument depends on the strength and relevance of that implied premise. If the suppressed premise is questionable or false, it can undermine the argument's validity. Thus, clarity and transparency in presenting all premises are crucial for robust reasoning.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
A premise in an argument is a statement or proposition that serves as the basis for the conclusion of the argument. It is presented as a reason or evidence to support the conclusion that the arguer is trying to establish. Premises are essential in constructing sound and valid arguments.
Not necessarily. An argument is not automatically true just because the premise and conclusion are true. The reasoning connecting the premise to the conclusion must also be valid for the argument to be considered true.
syllogism
In an argument, explicit statements are those that are clearly articulated and directly stated by the speaker or writer. These statements provide the main points or premises upon which the argument is based, and are typically used to support the argument's conclusion. Explicit statements help to make the argument's reasoning transparent and coherent.
explicit is clearly stated and implicit is not clearly stated
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
A deductive argument with two premises is called a syllogism. In a syllogism, one premise is the major premise, another is the minor premise, and they lead to a conclusion.
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Implicit premises are assumptions that are not explicitly stated in an argument but are necessary for the argument to be valid. For example, in the argument "All humans are mortal, Socrates is a human, therefore Socrates is mortal," an implicit premise is that if something is a human, it is mortal. Another example is in the argument "If it is raining, the ground is wet. The ground is wet, therefore it is raining," the implicit premise is that the only way the ground can be wet is if it is raining.