0
Which wave would have a longer wavelength those with 56 Hz frequency or 2 MHz frequency?
56 Hz.
What else can I help you with?
Which waves would have a longer wave length those with 56Hz frequency or 2 MHz frequency?
Wavelength at 2 MHz = 149.896 meters Wavelength at 56 Hz = 5,353.437 meters Lower frequency --> longer wavelength. Higher frequency --> shorter wavelength When you multiply (frequency) times (wavelength), the result is always the same number.
Which waves would have a longer wavelengththose with 56 Hz frequency or 2MHz frequency?
The waves with a 2MHz frequency would have a longer wavelength compared to those with a 56 Hz frequency. Wavelength and frequency are inversely related according to the equation: wavelength = speed of light / frequency. Since the speed of light is constant, higher frequency waves have shorter wavelengths.
What station would have the longer wavelength 90.5 MHz or 107.1 MHz?
The station with 107.1 MHz would have the longer wavelength.
Which waves would have a longer wave lengththose with 56Hz or 2 MHz frequency?
The waves with a 2 MHz frequency would have a longer wavelength compared to waves with a 56 Hz frequency. Wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, so as frequency increases, the wavelength decreases.
Which wave would have a longer wave length 56Hz or 2MHz?
A 2MHz wave would have a longer wavelength than a 56Hz wave. This is because wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional - higher frequency waves have shorter wavelengths and lower frequency waves have longer wavelengths.
What would happen to the wavelength of a wave if the frequency is halved?
If the frequency of a wave is halved, the wavelength would double. This is because the speed of the wave remains constant, so by halving the frequency (which is the number of wave cycles per unit time), each wave cycle now covers a longer distance, resulting in a longer wavelength.
A low energy electromagnetic wave would also have?
the lowest frequency Lester was here
Which waves would have a longer wavelength 56 Hz frequency or 2 MHz frequency?
First of all I just want to tell that if we have to compare two things then we should always find a relationship between each other, its not always like a formula. it can be anything. Well the relationship between frequency and wavelength is given by Wavelength = Speed of light (299792458m/s) / frequency (/s) putting the values we get the wavelength of 56 Hz or 56 (per second) to be- 5353436.75m and of 2 Mhz to be 149.8m i think you could have just said 56 Hz has a bigger wavelength.
If a wave is travelling at a certain speed and its frequency is cut in half what would happen to the wavelength of the wave?
it would become longer
If one tuning fork vibrates at 340 Hz and a second one vibrates at 640 Hz which fork sends out a longer wavelength?
Lower frequency equates to a longer wavelength, so the 340 Hz tuning fork would emit a longer wavelength sound.
Would a lower note have a shorter wavelength?
Yes, lower notes have longer wavelengths. In sound waves, frequency (pitch) and wavelength are inversely related - lower pitches have lower frequencies and longer wavelengths.
A wave with low frequency would have relatively?
A wave with low frequency would have a longer wavelength and carry less energy. It would also have fewer oscillations per unit of time compared to a high-frequency wave.
