If this is for apex, the answer is; Felicia and her coworkers.
primary - if only one carbon is attached to the carbon attached to the oxygen for example CH3-CH2-OH Secondary - if two carbons are attached to the carbon attached to the oxygen for example ...............................CH3-CH-OH .........................................| .......................................CH3 Tertiary - if three carbons are attached to the carbon attached to the oxygen for example ................................CH3 ..................................| ..........................CH3-C-OH ..................................| ................................CH3 (ignore the .'s it was the only way I could make the diagrams)
The control group is the one that is not manipulated in any way. Suppose we are testing the effect of studying on test scores. The group that did not study would be the control group. The group that did study would be the experimental group.
Someone, give me an answer NOW please :/
An experimental group is a group of subjects in an experiment that receives the treatment or intervention being studied. For example, in a study looking at the effects of a new drug on blood pressure, the group that is given the drug would be considered the experimental group.
Participating in a family movie night is considered a primary group interaction because it involves close relationships and informal interactions among family members. In contrast, attending a school field trip to a local theater is an example of a secondary group interaction, as it involves a larger, more structured environment with less personal connection, focusing on a shared activity among classmates and teachers.
Poor people, Democrats, hipsters (by choice- first group is too on the radar), and little people.
A lion is an example of a carnivore consumer, which is a group of consumers that primarily feeds on meat.
The answer to this question depends on what kind of secondary insurance you have - is it a group health plan? Is it a supplement? If Medicare is primary, there are still deductibles, copays, coinsurance that would need to be satisfied by your secondary insurance. Based on your question, I'm assuming that you have a group health plan with a copayment as your secondary insurance. If so, then yes, you would pay your copayment but it would not exceed the part B deductible.
Original letters or documents, for example. A secondary source would be an essay, for example, about the original source.
primary - if only one carbon is attached to the carbon attached to the oxygen for example CH3-CH2-OH Secondary - if two carbons are attached to the carbon attached to the oxygen for example ...............................CH3-CH-OH .........................................| .......................................CH3 Tertiary - if three carbons are attached to the carbon attached to the oxygen for example ................................CH3 ..................................| ..........................CH3-C-OH ..................................| ................................CH3 (ignore the .'s it was the only way I could make the diagrams)
Secondary gain-- The social, occupational, or interpersonal advantages that a patient derives from symptoms. A patient's being relieved of his or her share of household chores by other family members would be an example of secondary gain.
The amino acid proline is the only amino acid that has a secondary amine functional group. This is because proline is a cyclic amino acid that links the 3-carbon R-group back to the amine group, resulting in a secondary amine.
True
True
Primary would be the first of whatever you're talking about, and secondary would be the second or the once-removed whatever it is. For example, a primary source of research would be something like a diary or letter, which would be a first-line information source - a secondary source would be a textbook reporting about what the person described in the letter or diary.
A primary group has fact to face interactions and is more intimate than secondary groups. Secondary groups are more formal.
It depends. If it is your journal, or you are quoting from a journal you have actually seen, then no. A secondary source would be a newspaper report of that journal entry, for example. Unless the journal entry is stating something read or seen elsewhere, then it WOULD be a secondary source.