no
"Surgery" means the actual intervention into the body to correct problems. Not all illnesses require surgical intervention - for example pneumonia may require hospitalization, but no "surgical" intervention into the body to cure it. A surgical case would be a sub-set of total cases in any hospital at a given time. Outside the US, "surgery" can also mean a place where a doctor practices or surgeries are performed, not just the actual act.
You cannot lose leg fat in 20 minutes by any natural means. To do it in such a short time would require some surgical intervention.
You cannot lose 120 pounds in four weeks. It would require surgical intervention to cut away strips of body fat, which would put you at risk.
You simply cannot lose 80 pounds in one week. It would require surgical intervention to cut away strips of fat, which would put you at risk. You cannot do it by any natural means.
Any and All changes or alterations of coverage would require an endorsement to the policy.
I would see a vet because if it causes an obstruction in the bowel, it could be deadly without surgical intervention.
homested act
Well one you are over "0" or "00" you are pretty much at the "point of no return" past those points. To repair the lobes would require surgical intervention once the lobes have been allowed to shrink back as far as they can on there own. Wish I could tell you otherwise, but I am afraid it would be a lie........so I wont.
collapsed lung
I believe surgery should require a surgeon and since people who are piercing tongues are rarely surgeons, I would say: no!
lyndon b.johnson
clamier foo was here