Want this question answered?
ugly prejudiced
'The Enemy' by Pearl S. Buck raises a few important issues. Call of duty towards nation versus call of duty towards one's profession, is the major issue in the story. Dr. Sadao rescued a wounded prisoner of war who was washed ashore. The prisoner, in a dying state, according to his call of duty, should have been handed over to the police, yet his profession and his humanitarianism prevented him from doing so. He resolved to treat him first and then hand him over. However, the patient needed immediate surgery and despite all odds against him, Dr Sadao went ahead and operated upon him, thus saving his life. His domestic servants deserted him out of fear but he rose above narrow prejudices to save the wounded American soldier. Not only that, he helped the soldier to escape to freedom after having nurtured him to good health. He proved, in the end, that prejudices and hatred are man-made but love, compassion for human beings was instinctive. One needs to do one's duty towards fellow human beings.
mirabeau and danton and especially Robespierre were great orator in the revolution
the i dont like those people act
The largest Japanese Internment Camp built during World War 2 was the Oikawa camp in Nevada. It held approximately 50,000 people against their will during the war.
the ugly prejudices
There was prejudice because it was during the Great Depression and people in the US did not want foreigners taking their jobs.
yes
ugly prejudiced
Some prejudices depicted in "Farewell to Manzanar" include widespread anti-Japanese sentiment leading to the unjust incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II, as well as internalized racism and discrimination faced by Japanese Americans both during and after internment. Additionally, there is a portrayal of the societal stigma and prejudice against interracial relationships, as seen in the difficulties faced by Jeanne Wakatsuki's parents.
Cesar Chavez was discriminated against for several reasons. It would be almost impossible for a Latino farm worker not to have been discriminated against, especially during his time.
'The Enemy' by Pearl S. Buck raises a few important issues. Call of duty towards nation versus call of duty towards one's profession, is the major issue in the story. Dr. Sadao rescued a wounded prisoner of war who was washed ashore. The prisoner, in a dying state, according to his call of duty, should have been handed over to the police, yet his profession and his humanitarianism prevented him from doing so. He resolved to treat him first and then hand him over. However, the patient needed immediate surgery and despite all odds against him, Dr Sadao went ahead and operated upon him, thus saving his life. His domestic servants deserted him out of fear but he rose above narrow prejudices to save the wounded American soldier. Not only that, he helped the soldier to escape to freedom after having nurtured him to good health. He proved, in the end, that prejudices and hatred are man-made but love, compassion for human beings was instinctive. One needs to do one's duty towards fellow human beings.
Why was life especially hard in the south during the war?
Tom learns to hold prejudices against people of color and assumes they are inferior. He also harbors prejudices against people who are wealthy and well-educated, thinking they are snobbish and arrogant. Additionally, Tom shows prejudice towards people who are less powerful or socially prominent than him, believing he is superior to them.
Harper Lee pays meticulous attention to every aspect of the courtroom in "To Kill a Mockingbird" to highlight the injustices and prejudices present in the legal system during that time period. By focusing on the details of the trial, Lee sheds light on the flaws of the justice system and emphasizes the challenges faced by the accused, especially when they are marginalized or discriminated against. This attention to detail helps to underscore the novel's themes of racism, empathy, and social inequality.
The justification of the Espionage and Sedition Acts during times of war is a subject of debate. Supporters argue that national security was a priority and these acts were necessary to protect it. Critics argue that these acts violated civil liberties, particularly freedom of speech, and were used to suppress dissent and stifle political opposition. Ultimately, whether these acts were justifiable depends on one's perspective and interpretation of the balance between national security and individual rights.
For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.For the most part, no, Christianity was not illegal. It was only against the law during the persecutions.