Want this question answered?
Yes, there is violence in every period of time. Mankind is violent in nature.
He had advocated non-violence and peace during the achievement of his goals, and he stayed with that determination.
The stated reason was that they were protecting the Revolution. In truth they were often naming political rivals.
John Adams
The growing violence of the French Revolution resulted in various consequences. The Reign of Terror, led by Maximilien Robespierre, resulted in the execution of thousands of people, including political opponents and perceived enemies of the revolution. The violence also sparked a wave of fear and instability in France, leading to a loss of public support for the revolution and the rise of more conservative forces. Additionally, the violence and chaos of the revolution contributed to the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte and the establishment of the French Consulate and later the French Empire.
One key figure who advocated violence when needed to achieve equal rights was Malcolm X.
He was a Sikh clergyman who advocated for Khalistan through violence
malcom x
GANDHI
Malcolm X did not "use violence." He advocated for the moral right to use violence against an unjust aggressor attempting to do violence against you.
No revolution along the lines Marx foresaw has occurred. He advocated a revolution that would result in the abolition of the wages system.
Yes, there is violence in every period of time. Mankind is violent in nature.
No violence. The new King arrived by invitation.
He had advocated non-violence and peace during the achievement of his goals, and he stayed with that determination.
Absolutely bloody and violent. As said by Schama, violence was the motor that kept the revolution going.
The stated reason was that they were protecting the Revolution. In truth they were often naming political rivals.
The Czech revolution was called the Velvet Revolution because it was a peaceful transition of power, with minimal violence or bloodshed. The term "velvet" symbolizes the smooth and non-violent nature of the revolution. This was in contrast to other revolutions that involved more conflict and violence.