Changes of Zhou (周易)Taihao (太昊), Yan Emperor (炎帝), Yellow Emperor (黃帝), Emperor Yao (堯), Shun (舜)[3]Records of the Grand Historian (史記)Yellow Emperor (黃帝), Zhuanxu (顓頊), Emperor Ku (帝嚳), Emperor Yao (堯), Shun(舜)[3]Sovereign series(帝王世系)Shaohao (少昊), Zhuanxu (顓頊), Gaoxin (高辛), Emperor Yao (堯), Shun (舜)[3]
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
Trajan, Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius are considered the most outstanding among the five good emperors. Aurelian, Diocletian, Constantine I (or the Great) Theodosius I (or the Great) and Justinian I (or the Great) are considered the most outstanding emperors after the five good emperors.
The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.
Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.
Marcus Aurelius.
The Inca emperors.
There was no period of bad emperors as such. The term "five good emperors" is a historical tag given to the five emperors from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius because there was no great political crises during their reigns and the empire ran smoothly. A far as "bad emperors" went, you could say that every emperor had his negative points even Augustus -- some more than others.
Five, one of them is Augustus.
The first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - Nero
The Claudian emperors were two of the first five Roman emperors, or perhaps I should say one and a half of the first five Roman emperors. The first five emperors are referred to as the Julio-Claudian dynasty. This was because Augustus had no male heir and so adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. He was the "one" Claudian emperor. He was followed by Caligula, who was a Julian, and he, in turn was followed by Claudius who was a Claudian on his father's side and a Julian on his mother's side. So Claudius was half Claudian and half Julian. Nero, a Julian, rounded out the dynasty.
The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.
There was not a region of the five emperors. There was what historians have called the Year of the Five Emperors. After the emperor Commodus was assassinated, five men fought for the title on emperor and four of them were deposed. The five men were Pertinax, Didius Julianus, Pescennius Niger, Clodius Albinus and Septimius Severus. Septimius Severus was the man who managed to hold on to power and founded the Severan dynasty which lasted from 193 to 235 and had five emperors. Since all this happened within a year, it did not affect the prosperity of the empire.