0
The Bishops are the Successors of the Apostles.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was there apostles in the Old Testament?
The successors to the apostles are the current Bishops and Pope.
What were the occupation of most of the apostles?
The most common occupation of the apostles were that they were fishermen.
Was the acts of the apostles in the old or New Testament?
No. The Book of Acts is in the New Testament.
Most of the twelve apostles were?
Most of the 12 apostles were fishermen, simple people not educated.
The Twelve Apostles Landmark?
the twelve apostles are a natural collection of limestone rocks in Victoria
Who are the successors of the apostles today?
The bishops.
Who are the modern-day successors of the Apostles?
A:The Church considers its bishops to be the successors of the apostles. At first, there was no particular bishop designated as the specific successor to Peter. Pope Anicetus (156-166), during the course of a theological argument with the venerable Polycarp of Smyrna, claimed that Peter had travelled to Rome to lead the Christians there and had been beheaded in Rome, meaning that he (Anicetus) spoke with the authority of Peter. From this time forward, the bishops of Rome increasingly insisted that they were the successors of St Peter, until it is now an article of faith that they are.
Was there apostles in the Old Testament?
The successors to the apostles are the current Bishops and Pope.
What is the Bishop staff?
The bishops are the successors of the 12 Apostles.
Is confession a sacrament of Jesus?
Yes. Jesus told the Apostles "Whoever's sins you forgive, they are forgiven them. Whoever's sins you retain, they have been retained." John 20:23. Bishops are the successors of the Apostles.
What is Apostolic?
Apostolic is the mark of the Church which indicates that the teaching authority of the Church comes directly from Jesus and his chosen Apostles because the bishops of the church are direct successors of the Apostles.
Bishops are considered the same as who?
Roman Catholic AnswerBishops are the successors of the Apostles and they stand as "alter Christus" (another Christ). In the Church they are considered as the father.
How did the church leader Irenaeus help bring about the rise of the pope and the Roman church?
Irenaeus claimed -that the Apostles had appointed bishops as their successors, -that these successors had in turn appointed successors of their own, -and that much (if not all) of the authority of the Apostles had therefore been passed down in an unbroken line to the bishops of his day.
Why do you have to be a real man to be a priest?
It's called "institutional sexism". The Episcopal Church allows women priests. Because Jesus choose only men to be his apostles, and priests are the successors of the apostles. As for the person who call it "institutional sexism", it's like saying that Jesus also instituted sexism for having only male apostles.
What is the difference in the Catholic faith and the covenant faith?
The Catholic faith was started by Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, on the Apostles, with Peter, and his successors at its head to lead people to God. Peter's successors (the Popes) and the successors to the apostles (the Bishops) have been leading the Catholic Church ever since. Our Blessed Lord guaranteed it and send the Holy Spirit to guide it until the end of the world. . Covenant faith is yet another of the over 30,000 "Christian" denominations which have been started by various people over the last four hundred years which purport to follow Jesus, while completely ignoring Him in His Church.
Does the Bible speak about Bishops who were the successors of the Apostles in any books that can be named?
The only books of the Bible that really mention bishops are the pseudo-Pauline epistles known as 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus. New Testament scholars almost universally believe these books to have been written during the first half of the second century, and coincide with the earliest known appointments of bishops. The Epistles to Timothy portray Paul as appointing Timothy as a bishop, but of course not as his successor, and there is no mention of the bishops being appointed as direct successors of the apostles.
What did William the Conqueror didnt do with his successors?
William the Conqueror and his successors did not
