I'm sure there were others both before him and after him who aruged the same question, but I know that Thomas Hobbes was one that argued it.
All of them.
Well the human brain is the most developed than any other animal so we are the most complex beings
The ability to make tools.
the moral nature of human beings
The basic need if a human being is food, shelter and clothing. These are things that he cannot survive without.
Thomas Hobbes, a philosopher, proposed the idea that human beings are inherently selfish and brutal in his work "Leviathan" published in 1651. He argued that without a strong government to control human impulses, society would descend into chaos and violence.
Thomas Hobbes believed that human beings were naturally selfish, competitive, and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in a state of nature, without a strong central authority, human life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short."
Advertising creates needs or wants in a world where the basic human needs have not been met for most human beings.
Jesus possesses two natures: a divine nature and a human nature.
The basic theme of Confucianism is respect and caring for fellow human beings. A believer of Confucianism should always try to be altruistic and selfless.
John Locke believed that all human beings had a natural right to life, along with liberty and property. This concept is outlined in his work "Two Treatises of Government". Locke argued that these rights were inherent and inalienable.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that human beings are naturally good but are corrupted by society and its institutions. He argued that society, with its inequalities and artificial constructs, leads to moral corruption and loss of freedom.