answersLogoWhite

0

Bailey Recton ;)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What did the loyalists think about the intolerable acts?

Loyalists viewed the Intolerable Acts as necessary measures to maintain order and authority in the American colonies. They believed these laws were a legitimate response to colonial unrest and actions such as the Boston Tea Party, which they saw as rebellious and unjustified. Loyalists feared that resistance to the British government would lead to chaos and undermine the benefits of British rule, such as protection and economic stability. Overall, they supported the Acts as a means to restore peace and loyalty to the crown.


Why was the intolerable act written?

The Intolerable Acts, passed in 1774, were a series of punitive measures enacted by the British Parliament in response to the Boston Tea Party and other acts of colonial defiance. The goal was to restore order in the American colonies by punishing Massachusetts and asserting British authority. These acts aimed to suppress dissent and discourage other colonies from supporting Massachusetts in its resistance to British rule, ultimately escalating tensions that led to the American Revolution.


Why did the British parliament pass the intolerable acts in 1774 in order to?

The British Parliament passed the Intolerable Acts in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party, where American colonists protested against British taxation by dumping tea into Boston Harbor. The Acts aimed to punish Massachusetts for this act of defiance, restore order, and assert British authority over the colonies. They included measures such as closing Boston Harbor and revoking Massachusetts' charter, which further inflamed tensions and united the colonies against British rule. Ultimately, the Intolerable Acts contributed to the growing desire for independence among the colonists.


Why did the king and parliament enforce The Intolerable Acts?

The Intolerable Acts were enacted by the British Parliament in 1774 as a response to the Boston Tea Party and the growing unrest in the American colonies. These punitive measures aimed to assert British authority and punish Massachusetts for its defiance, particularly by closing Boston Harbor and revoking the colony's charter. The Acts were intended to restore order and discourage further rebellion, but instead, they united the colonies against British rule and fueled the push for independence.


Why did the British government hope the Coercive (or Intolerable) Acts would bring order back to Boston?

The British government hoped the Coercive (or Intolerable) Acts would restore order in Boston by punishing the colonists for the Boston Tea Party and reasserting British authority. They aimed to isolate Massachusetts, deter further protests, and demonstrate that defiance would lead to significant consequences. By closing Boston Harbor and restricting town meetings, officials believed they could quell unrest and reestablish control over the increasingly rebellious colonies. Ultimately, however, these measures intensified colonial resentment and resistance.


What caused the intolerable acts to be passed?

The Intolerable Acts, also known as the Coercive Acts, were passed in 1774 by the British Parliament in response to the Boston Tea Party, where American colonists protested against British taxation by dumping tea into Boston Harbor. These punitive measures aimed to restore order in Massachusetts and assert British authority over the colonies. The Acts included the closure of Boston Harbor and the revocation of Massachusetts' charter, which further inflamed tensions between Britain and the colonies, ultimately leading to the Revolutionary War.


What did the British hope to accomplish with the Intolerable Acts?

The British intended the Intolerable Acts, enacted in 1774, to assert control over the American colonies and punish Massachusetts for the Boston Tea Party. By closing Boston Harbor and revoking the Massachusetts Charter, they aimed to suppress colonial resistance and restore order. The British government hoped that these punitive measures would deter other colonies from supporting Massachusetts and reinforce their authority in the face of growing dissent. However, instead of quelling rebellion, the Acts united the colonies against British rule, ultimately fueling the drive toward independence.


Why did they make the intolerable?

THE intolerable Act was made in order to tax the civilvans to support the crown


When were The Intolerable Acts passed what was their purpose?

The Intolerable Acts were passed by the British Parliament in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party and growing colonial unrest. Their purpose was to punish the Massachusetts colonists for defying British authority and to restore order by closing Boston Harbor, altering the Massachusetts charter, and allowing British troops to be quartered in private homes. These measures aimed to reassert British control over the colonies but ultimately fueled colonial resistance and unity against British rule.


British parliament passed the Intolerable Act in order to?

The Intolerable Acts or the Coercive Acts are names used to describe a series of five laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 relating to Britain's colonies in North America. The acts triggered outrage and resistance in the Thirteen Colonies that later became the United States, and were important developments in the growth of the American Revolution. Affirmative :)


Why did they make the intolerable act?

THE intolerable Act was made in order to tax the civilvans to support the crown


Why did the Parliament decide to pass 4 new laws in Massachusetts colonies in 1774?

The Parliament enacted the four new laws, known as the Coercive Acts or Intolerable Acts, in response to the Boston Tea Party and the growing unrest in the Massachusetts colonies. These laws aimed to punish Massachusetts for its defiance, particularly targeting Boston by closing its harbor and altering its governance to diminish local control. The intent was to restore order and assert British authority, but instead, they galvanized colonial resistance and united the colonies against British rule.