Slaves and farmers who asked landowners for land to work would be the least benefit since they would get, usually, indebted to that person.
Sharecropping benefited both the workers and the owners. Sharecropping involved tenants farming land that is owned by someone else in return for a share of the crops.
Sharecroppers, typically impoverished farmers, benefited the least from sharecropping arrangements. While they had access to land and resources, they often found themselves trapped in a cycle of debt and poverty due to exploitative contracts with landowners. The profits from their labor were frequently insufficient to cover living expenses and debts, leaving them economically vulnerable and dependent on the landowners. As a result, sharecroppers rarely achieved financial independence or stability.
Slaves and farmers who asked landowners for land to work would be the least benefit since they would get, usually, indebted to that person.
Slaves and farmers who asked landowners for land to work would be the least benefit since they would get, usually, indebted to that person.
Land Owners.
Land Owners.
The landowners benefited least from a sharecropping arrangement, as they often faced financial instability and reliance on the labor of sharecroppers for their income. While they initially retained ownership of the land, the sharecropping system often led to cycles of debt for both parties, limiting the landowners' ability to profit significantly. Additionally, as sharecroppers struggled to make ends meet, landowners found it challenging to maintain consistent agricultural output and profitability. Overall, the system was designed to exploit the labor of sharecroppers, leaving landowners with diminishing returns.
the slaves
The sharecroppers are the ones who benefited the least from a sharecropper agreement.
Minorities and women were the least benefited from the New Deal policies.
Sharecropping, in which a wealthy landowner rents land to farmers in exchange for a share of their crops
Landowners