0
The only scientific consensus on "the origin of life" is that it arose of organic molecules. Charles Darwin is often cited for this theory but his theory of evolution only dealt with the changes within existing organisms.
There isn't really a single scientist one can name and give credit to for abiogenesis.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Description of the Scientific Theory of the Origin of Life?
The word "abiogenesis" refers to the origin of life. There is as yet no actual well developed scientific theory for the origin of life, although there are popular hypotheses. One hypothesis is that RNA dominated the world before DNA. The word "evolution" (in a biological sense) refers to the origin of species, which pertains to the subsequent diversification of life once it came into existence. Evolution does not (at this time) incorporate any theory of life's actual beginning.
Who proposed the biochemical theory of origin of life?
Alexander Ivanovich Oparin was a Soviet biochemist who, in 1924, put forward a coherent theory for the origin of life through gradually increasing sophistication of biochemical change in his book The Origin of Life.
How does intelligent design differ from the prevailing Darwinist view of evolution?
Evolution is a fact-based scientific theory backed up by more than a century of research and observation. It is a solid theory that fits the facts observed in biology, paleontology, and geology. Evolution adresses the origin and evolution of life, not that of the universe. ID is a religion-based concept with no substantiated evidence that science would accept as such. It is in conflict with observed facts in four main scientific disciplines: biology, geology, paleontology, and cosmology. It makes statements about everything from the origin of the universe & the earth to the origin of life and denies the evolution of species, claiming that all species were created, but offers no explanation on the mechanisms of the process other than stating they are of supernatural origin.
Which model of the origin of life is currently considered to be the most accurate?
theory of evolution
Critique two scientific models that explain the origin of life?
One scientific model is PSM which theories that the origin of life began from molecules found in the ocean. Another scientific model for the origin of life is BM which believes chemicals surfaced on top of the water. Both theories are hard to prove.
According to the Scientific Theory of the Origin of Life Prokaryotic Cells could have originated from?
lalala
Description of the Scientific Theory of the Origin of Life?
The word "abiogenesis" refers to the origin of life. There is as yet no actual well developed scientific theory for the origin of life, although there are popular hypotheses. One hypothesis is that RNA dominated the world before DNA. The word "evolution" (in a biological sense) refers to the origin of species, which pertains to the subsequent diversification of life once it came into existence. Evolution does not (at this time) incorporate any theory of life's actual beginning.
Does the cell theory answer the question of how or where life originally came from explain?
No. Cell theory is the theory that cells make up organisms. The only theory dealing with the origin of life is life origin theory.
Who proposed the biochemical theory of origin of life?
Alexander Ivanovich Oparin was a Soviet biochemist who, in 1924, put forward a coherent theory for the origin of life through gradually increasing sophistication of biochemical change in his book The Origin of Life.
Is evolution the scientific belief?
Yes, evolutionary theory is the scientific explanation for life's diversity.
Was life created from non life?
Most of the scientist are of d opinion that life originated from lifeless ( inanimate ) matter known as theory of abiogenic origin or chemical evolution of life . Since this theory is only one that provides explanation , which can be tested ,most scientists tentatively accepted it .
How does intelligent design differ from the prevailing Darwinist view of evolution?
Evolution is a fact-based scientific theory backed up by more than a century of research and observation. It is a solid theory that fits the facts observed in biology, paleontology, and geology. Evolution adresses the origin and evolution of life, not that of the universe. ID is a religion-based concept with no substantiated evidence that science would accept as such. It is in conflict with observed facts in four main scientific disciplines: biology, geology, paleontology, and cosmology. It makes statements about everything from the origin of the universe & the earth to the origin of life and denies the evolution of species, claiming that all species were created, but offers no explanation on the mechanisms of the process other than stating they are of supernatural origin.
How does scientific evidence support the theory of geologic evolution?
I am a geologist and I know of no theory of "geologic evolution". "Evolution" as defined by Darwin describes the origin of species based on the survival of the fittest. This certainly can not be applied to geological processes, although life is integral to geology.
What spontaneous generation?
Aristotle came up with the hypothesis that living things could be created from inanimate objects. It was a theory of the origin of life before it was proven wrong.
What are Spontaneous Generation?
Spontaneous generation is a disproven theory that living organisms could arise from non-living matter. This idea was widely accepted in ancient times but was ultimately debunked by scientific experiments in the 17th century. It paved the way for the modern understanding of biogenesis, which states that living organisms can only come from preexisting living organisms.
Which model of the origin of life is currently considered to be the most accurate?
theory of evolution
The big bang theory and origin of the Earth?
The big bang theory deals with the formation and evolution of the Universe, it has nothing to do with the origin of life on Earth.
