Want this question answered?
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory, scientists will most likely
If the atom is made out of destructible matter, it can be destroyed. This was proven with the double-slit experiment.
A theory. Its the Atom Theory. The old theory used to be that an atom was just like a billiard ball.
Dalton's theory was more successful than Democritus's theory because of evidence. Evidence existed to support Dalton's theory. While Democritus didn't have any evidence to back up his theory.
the structure of the atom
democritus
Democritus
Democritus
yo gramdma
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory, scientists will most likely
Yes he did
The experimental evidence led Rutherford to conclude that an atom is mostly empty space because most of the particles weren't deflected off of the gold foil in his experiment.
That is correct.
According to the theory and experimental findings of Particle Physics until now, electrons are not found in the nucleus.
No, he theorized that there was a small indivisible particle (he called the "atom" because it means indivisible), but he never did any experiments to prove his theory. Around the same time, Aristotle believed that matter could be divided infinitely. Both were considered speculation until the eighteenth century.
The third principle of Dalton atomic theory is no supported.
dylan narvadez