Typically they were placed in the middle of town with their arms and head through a wooden block. If they did something horrific there were a number of torture devices: The iron maiden, tied to a tree and a horse tied to your limbs, red hot branding, suspension by your arms, items being shoved under your fingernails, guillotine, gauntlets and so on...
also they had something called the spider that is just an advanced breast ripper. the woman's breast would be attached and then they would pull her away and it would rip it off.
the pear of anguish was a device that go into someones mouth, or a vagina/Angus then when you crank the lever it would open and rip the skin open from stretching it. a person would normally die from infections.
AnswerWe really are interested in torture in our society, and cannot seem to get enough of it. Sometimes I think it is why we are so interested in the Middle Ages. Punishment in the Middle Ages did include torture, without doubt, and there were times and places where it was common, but if we are going to examine punishments of the time, we should examine all of them, and not focus exclusively on those that were good plot elements for bad movies.During the Early Middle Ages, people were subject to a combination of Germanic Laws and Roman Law. In some respects, Germanic laws were often less severe. For example, there was the concept of weregeld, which prescribed the fine a person had to pay for killing someone. If you killed a freeman, you were fined 200 solidi. If you killed a priest, you were fined 300 solidi or 400 if he was saying mass when you killed him. A member of the nobility was 1200 solidi and up. Killing the king would set you back 30,000 solidi, 15,000 to his family, and 15,000 to the state. Evaluating killing a person in terms of a fine may seem brutal, but that is not the point; kings were presiding over legal systems that would fine a person who murdered them. This came to an end, of course, but it was the way things were for the first few centuries of the middle ages. (see link)
We have the idea of burning a witch at the stake, and this no doubt happened. After all, it happened to Joan of Arc. Nevertheless, in the Early Middle Ages, the legal codes of the Franks and the edicts of the Church forbade belief inwitchcraft, and so execution for witchcraft was illegal since legally witchcraft did not exist. (see link)
Our views of legal proceedings of the times are also a bit askew. There was a concept of Compurgation which operated into the High Middle Ages. If a person charged with a crime swore an oath that he was innocent and was able to produce at least 12 people who would testify that they believed the oath, then he was likely to be regarded as having defended himself successfully. (see link)
There was also the concept that clergy were exempt from secular courts and had to be tried by the Church. There were ecclesiastical courts set up for this purpose, and they were operated in a very different way than secular courts, because they were more merciful and aimed at correction rather than instilling fear. There was a problem of proof that a person qualified. Originally this meant that a person had to show up for court dressed like clergy, but anyone could do that, so it was decided that the benefit would be given to anyone who was literate, and a test was instituted. Benefit of Clergy, implying immunity from secular prosecution, was eventually extended in England to anyone who could read the 51st Psalm. As far as I know, there was no test to find out whether the person had memorized the 51st Psalm. The law establishing this came just about the same time a Pope banned clergy from participation in torture. So anyone who was literate could, in theory, avoid torture. (See link)
In addition to this, there was sanctuary. If a person was being pursued, he or she could hide out in a church or monastery. In many times and places, the person charged with a crime had a limited time in sanctuary, but in other times and places a person could simply stay in a monastery, and this is especially true for a person who was not a fugitive from the law but from abuse or danger. Medieval queens sometimes did this to get away from their husbands, and it was effective.
I have read that punishments of the Middle Ages included such things as wearing a mask with a pig's face on it for a prescribed period of time, but I have been unable to confirm this.
I am not going to portray this as anything like a description of what medieval punishments were. But clearly they were more varied than one might imagine.
it all depends on the crime...
The greatest and most grievous punishment used in England for such as offend against the State is drawing from the prison to the place of execution upon an hurdle or sled, where they are hanged till they be half dead, and then taken down, and quartered alive; after that, their members and bowels are cut from their bodies, and thrown into a fire, provided near hand and within their own sight, even for the same purpose
go to the site below
During the Early Middle Ages, most crimes were punished with a fine. Even murder had a prescribed fine, though it was pretty stiff. A person who could not pay the fine was sold into slavery to pay it.
Later on, a variety of more creative punishments were developed. People who were troublesome were put into stocks, where their neighbors could humiliate them at will. Death by torture happened, though usually not as frequently as some people might guess; when used for secular purposes, it was usually only used for treason. For most of the Middle Ages, the Church strongly condemned torture.
Prison was not used except to hold people waiting trial, to keep captives waiting ransom, or for political purposes. Sometimes people were put on a sort of equivalent of house arrest, and were required to stay within a prescribed neighborhood at all times.
The pictures we have of widespread burning of witches during the Middle Ages are quite untrue. There were a few people killed in this way, notably Joan of Arc. But the Middle Ages ended in the middle of the 15th century, and the earliest witch hunts came decades later.
they put them in a stock and other people threw food at them sometimes the person would die in the stock Hope i helped
they hanged people for steeling
death by fire
for giving out secret information to there enemy.
well we are middle ages people! so how do we live with our animals?
No, not only guilty people were punished in the Middle Ages. Punishments were often severe and indiscriminate, targeting not only criminals but also those accused of witchcraft, heresy, or other perceived transgressions. Innocent people were sometimes wrongly accused and subjected to torture and execution, reflecting the harsh and unforgiving nature of justice during that time.
The church had the most power in the middle ages because it was the one thing that united people.
The Middle Ages were also called the Age of Faith.
The 'Jack Stankovic' would punish people.
torture
When you were to be punished, you would be put to DEATH!
heretics, moors, and jews
for giving out secret information to there enemy.
drunkards were punished in the middle ages in diffrent ways, some might be put in the stocks for 2 days,or have there hands chopped of so they can drink again ---- Actually, Its Only The Stocks. You Dont Get Your Hands Cut Off. But Other Than That The Answer Is Correct.
well we are middle ages people! so how do we live with our animals?
People liked pudding and pickles in the middle ages
During the Middle Ages, most people were farmers.
During the Middle Ages, most people were farmers.
No
answer.