answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who got attacked by the snake in nectar in a sieve?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the release dates for Got Home Alive - 2011 Mexican Jungle Kidnapping Attacked in Rome Rogue River Snake Bite 1-3?

Got Home Alive - 2011 Mexican Jungle Kidnapping Attacked in Rome Rogue River Snake Bite 1-3 was released on: USA: 24 November 2011 USA: 27 November 2011


Did the undertaker got attack?

You can't got attack but u could get attacked and no he did not get attacked


When was Snake's Got a Leg created?

Snake's Got a Leg was created in 2001.


How the snake got poison?

How the Snake Got Poison by Zora Neale Hurston


What does this quote mean work without hope draws Nectar in A Sieve and hope without an object cannot live?

"Nectar in a sieve" represents the pointlessness of having work without hope. After all, if you put nectar in a sieve, it all just goes through. So, the first line is saying that work needs a motivation, which would be hope. Otherwise no one would work. The second line on the other hand is about how hope can only survive if it has something to return. For example, you can't hope endlessly if there is no substance and work to back it up. This line I got in a debate with my friend about. That was my interpretation. My friend said that it means hope needs a person (which is the object) to be hoping. Otherwise hope wouldn't exist. All in all, the lines mean that work needs hope and hope needs work. At least, that's what I think =]


What does this quote mean- work without hope draws Nectar in A Sieve and hope without an object cannot live?

"Nectar in a sieve" represents the pointlessness of having work without hope. After all, if you put nectar in a sieve, it all just goes through. So, the first line is saying that work needs a motivation, which would be hope. Otherwise no one would work. The second line on the other hand is about how hope can only survive if it has something to return. For example, you can't hope endlessly if there is no substance and work to back it up. This line I got in a debate with my friend about. That was my interpretation. My friend said that it means hope needs a person (which is the object) to be hoping. Otherwise hope wouldn't exist. All in all, the lines mean that work needs hope and hope needs work. At least, that's what I think =]


What is the effect of English attacked Quakers?

The Quakers got attacked


What are you supposed to do if you got a werewolf bite?

eat ambrosia and drink nectar


Which of Michelangelo's works was attacked?

The Pieta is one of Michelangelo's works that got attacked.


What day did Bethany get attacked by the shark?

she got attacked by shark on monday the 21st


Attacked Belgium in WW1?

they got annoyed


How pearl harbor got attacked?

by planes