"Nectar in a sieve" represents the pointlessness of having work without hope. After all, if you put nectar in a sieve, it all just goes through. So, the first line is saying that work needs a motivation, which would be hope. Otherwise no one would work.
The second line on the other hand is about how hope can only survive if it has something to return. For example, you can't hope endlessly if there is no substance and work to back it up. This line I got in a debate with my friend about. That was my interpretation. My friend said that it means hope needs a person (which is the object) to be hoping. Otherwise hope wouldn't exist.
All in all, the lines mean that work needs hope and hope needs work. At least, that's what I think =]
This riddle describes a "sieve" or "strainer." A sieve is round in shape, has a deep bowl-like structure similar to a tub, but because it has holes, it cannot hold water, making it unable to be filled by the ocean. The imagery highlights the paradox of its shape and the inability to retain liquid.
quickly
The Jumblies
a sieve
The riddle represents the sieve that helped solve the mystery of Cass's Will
"Work without hope draws nectar in a sieve, And hope without an object cannot live." right before the introduction.
"Nectar in a Sieve" was written by Kamala Markandaya and first published in 1954.
Nectar in a Sieve has 190 pages.
Sure! A possible thesis for "Nectar in a Sieve" could be: "The novel 'Nectar in a Sieve' explores the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity, highlighting the importance of perseverance and hope amidst challenges such as poverty, modernization, and loss."
No one
The title "Nectar in a Sieve" symbolizes the idea of trying to grasp something precious and fleeting, only to have it slip through your fingers. The nectar represents sustenance, beauty, and sweetness, while the sieve represents the inevitable loss or inability to fully retain these qualities.
Perhaps, if the regal government constitutes the ability to sieve nectar, provided it is in a powdered state thus allowing it to be sieved, if that is the case then perhaps the dictionary of law will allow the ability to sieve the substance in question, which it does in Page 397, Paragraph 2 Of The regal Constitution Of nectar Sieving.
He grows rice.
"Nectar in a sieve" represents the pointlessness of having work without hope. After all, if you put nectar in a sieve, it all just goes through. So, the first line is saying that work needs a motivation, which would be hope. Otherwise no one would work. The second line on the other hand is about how hope can only survive if it has something to return. For example, you can't hope endlessly if there is no substance and work to back it up. This line I got in a debate with my friend about. That was my interpretation. My friend said that it means hope needs a person (which is the object) to be hoping. Otherwise hope wouldn't exist. All in all, the lines mean that work needs hope and hope needs work. At least, that's what I think =]
she didnt!! :D
Arjun, Thambi, Murugan, Raja, Selvam, and Kuti.
Rural India, during a time when there was a lot of urban development in the land.